giraph-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gustavo Enrique Salazar Torres <gsala...@ime.usp.br>
Subject Re: Experimental Integration into Mahout
Date Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:50:10 GMT
+1 (examples could be used for tutorial purposes).


On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Mirko Kämpf <mirko.kaempf@cloudera.com>wrote:

> +1
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Sebastian Schelter <ssc@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On 12.03.2013 20:33, Jake Mannix wrote:
> > > +1 to this distinction
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Avery Ching <aching@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> My thoughts were that examples would be like toy examples (not
> suitable
> > >> for production) that might be used, say, for unittesting.
>  Applications
> > >> would be full-fledged ready to run applications that should have
> > perhaps a
> > >> supporting input format for actual data.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 3/12/13 12:19 PM, Claudio Martella wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> My thoughts are: what is the difference then between the applications
> > and
> > >>> the examples package?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Avery Ching <aching@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>  HI Nicolas,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I'd be interested in seeing this algorithm implemented in Giraph.
My
> > >>>> suggestion would be to put it directly in Giraph.  We should create
> a
> > new
> > >>>> maven module called giraph-applications and then maybe something
> like
> > >>>> org.apache.giraph.application.****affinity package.  You can see
> > >>>> org.apache.giraph.examples as an example. We should also move the
> > other
> > >>>> actual applications out of examples so that they are easier to
run.
> > >>>>  Anyone
> > >>>> else have any thoughts?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Avery
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 3/12/13 12:12 PM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>  I am not sure what you think by integration, but I am implementing
> > the
> > >>>>> affinity propagation algorithm proposed by Frey and Dueck [1].
And
> > >>>>> Giraph
> > >>>>> is a perfect fit for the implementation. And I was wondering,
if I
> > have
> > >>>>> the
> > >>>>> opportunity to contribute that implementation, where should
I post
> > it ?
> > >>>>> Giraph since it is based on it ? Or Mahout along with the other
> > >>>>> clustering
> > >>>>> algorithm ?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I just subscribed to mahout-dev@ in case some discussion starts
> > there
> > >>>>> too.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Nicolas
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> [1] http://www.psi.toronto.edu/****affinitypropagation/**<
> > http://www.psi.toronto.edu/**affinitypropagation/**>
> > >>>>> FreyDueckScience07.pdf<http://**www.psi.toronto.edu/**
> > >>>>> affinitypropagation/**FreyDueckScience07.pdf<
> > http://www.psi.toronto.edu/affinitypropagation/FreyDueckScience07.pdf>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Le 12 mars 2013 à 08:50, Sebastian Schelter <ssc@apache.org>
a
> > écrit :
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>   Hi fellow Giraphers,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> on Mahout's dev@ mailinglist, there is a discussion about
a
> > potential
> > >>>>>> (experimental) future integration of Giraph. Might be good
to hear
> > your
> > >>>>>> opinion about that.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>> Sebastian
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> --
> Mirko Kämpf
>
> *Trainer* @ Cloudera
>
> tel: +49 *176 20 63 51 99*
> skype: *kamir1604*
> mirko@cloudera.com
>



-- 
Gustavo Salazar Torres
---------------------------------
- "When describing your own work, be humble and don’t use superlatives of
praise, either explicitly or implicitly, even if you are enthusiastic"
- Mathematical Writing, Donald Knuth

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message