Mailing-List: contact dev-help@giraph.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@giraph.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cdoronc@gmail.com designates
 209.85.223.180 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <508B2560.60802@apache.org>
References: 
 <CA+ULb+vkAnO4dziV=HJy9bVyacjNXNL6_1qV6HWMr5hAoLZcAg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOsFL5T7Kt8q6WofbLxRH_Y_K+g4FPc6iW0Wm4HOCRHg81VrLA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+ULb+sE5YtSmR0Yq77KKOQOV3Q4AiNc-dFA7hdQ-gcOoDSAaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<508B2560.60802@apache.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 21:31:00 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAGFWK3WhQ=-VTwth9NMd_kFiBBPCvh5MjPSpyAXqFN=sT3VDaw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Giraph 0.2.0
From: Doron Cohen <cdoronc@gmail.com>
To: dev@giraph.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0447a27feaeac804cd0f7988

--f46d0447a27feaeac804cd0f7988
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi, any chance to include GIRAPH-42 (so sent-messages counter > 0)?
Thanks, Doron

On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Avery Ching <aching@apache.org> wrote:

> I agree with this.  No showstoppers. The next version will have a ton of
> improvements though.  Would be really nice to have GIRAPH-388 in though as
> it has a large performance impact.
>
> Avery
>
>
> On 10/26/12 2:48 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Eli Reisman <apache.mailbox@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I can say from the list you have, GIRAPH-260 and GIRAPH-263 are not
>>> blockers as far as I can see. Some of the other JIRA issues on the list
>>> might be easily resolved one way or the other as well at this point. I
>>> think both can safely be resolved at this point (260 can be a "won't
>>> fix",
>>> and 263 "fixed" as far as i can tell?)
>>>
>> Can we make a call on them one way or another? That would be helpful.
>> Personally, I'm going to triage a couple of the ones I had in there:
>>      https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/GIRAPH-198<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-198>
>>      https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/GIRAPH-199<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-199>
>>
>> At this point it looks as though we don't really have any showstoppers
>> for 0.2. At this point I'd like to proceed with a branch creation, RCs
>> and testing via Bigtop and other means on my side of things. Will
>> report accordingly.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Roman.
>>
>
>

--f46d0447a27feaeac804cd0f7988--