giraph-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Eli Reisman <>
Subject Re: Giraph 0.2.0
Date Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:16:24 GMT
The object weight thing (I think GIRAPH-260) can be resolved as "won't fix"
for now, we ended up handling this issue a different way and can come back
to that idea later. At that point, the idea will be good but that
particular JIRA might not be up to date.

Hyunsik was handling the jenkins stuff for 263, that should be resolved one
way or another soon as well. There are a few more.

As far as a graph generator, we have GIRAPH-26 waiting on a change from
Colt math libraries to mahout's and it should be good to go. I was told it
worked well by the guy who wrote it, but he has been out of touch lately.

I will take another peek at the other outstanding issues when I have time
and hopefully can sit down and get a few resolved.


On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Eli Reisman <>
> wrote:
> > I can say from the list you have, GIRAPH-260 and GIRAPH-263 are not
> > blockers as far as I can see. Some of the other JIRA issues on the list
> > might be easily resolved one way or the other as well at this point. I
> > think both can safely be resolved at this point (260 can be a "won't
> fix",
> > and 263 "fixed" as far as i can tell?)
> Can we make a call on them one way or another? That would be helpful.
> Personally, I'm going to triage a couple of the ones I had in there:
> At this point it looks as though we don't really have any showstoppers
> for 0.2. At this point I'd like to proceed with a branch creation, RCs
> and testing via Bigtop and other means on my side of things. Will
> report accordingly.
> Thanks,
> Roman.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message