giraph-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Doron Cohen <cdor...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Giraph 0.2.0
Date Sat, 27 Oct 2012 19:31:00 GMT
Hi, any chance to include GIRAPH-42 (so sent-messages counter > 0)?
Thanks, Doron

On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Avery Ching <aching@apache.org> wrote:

> I agree with this.  No showstoppers. The next version will have a ton of
> improvements though.  Would be really nice to have GIRAPH-388 in though as
> it has a large performance impact.
>
> Avery
>
>
> On 10/26/12 2:48 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Eli Reisman <apache.mailbox@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I can say from the list you have, GIRAPH-260 and GIRAPH-263 are not
>>> blockers as far as I can see. Some of the other JIRA issues on the list
>>> might be easily resolved one way or the other as well at this point. I
>>> think both can safely be resolved at this point (260 can be a "won't
>>> fix",
>>> and 263 "fixed" as far as i can tell?)
>>>
>> Can we make a call on them one way or another? That would be helpful.
>> Personally, I'm going to triage a couple of the ones I had in there:
>>      https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/GIRAPH-198<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-198>
>>      https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/GIRAPH-199<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-199>
>>
>> At this point it looks as though we don't really have any showstoppers
>> for 0.2. At this point I'd like to proceed with a branch creation, RCs
>> and testing via Bigtop and other means on my side of things. Will
>> report accordingly.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Roman.
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message