giraph-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Avery Ching <ach...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Giraph 0.2.0
Date Sat, 27 Oct 2012 00:05:52 GMT
I agree with this.  No showstoppers. The next version will have a ton of 
improvements though.  Would be really nice to have GIRAPH-388 in though 
as it has a large performance impact.

Avery

On 10/26/12 2:48 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Eli Reisman <apache.mailbox@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I can say from the list you have, GIRAPH-260 and GIRAPH-263 are not
>> blockers as far as I can see. Some of the other JIRA issues on the list
>> might be easily resolved one way or the other as well at this point. I
>> think both can safely be resolved at this point (260 can be a "won't fix",
>> and 263 "fixed" as far as i can tell?)
> Can we make a call on them one way or another? That would be helpful.
> Personally, I'm going to triage a couple of the ones I had in there:
>      https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-198
>      https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-199
>
> At this point it looks as though we don't really have any showstoppers
> for 0.2. At this point I'd like to proceed with a branch creation, RCs
> and testing via Bigtop and other means on my side of things. Will
> report accordingly.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.


Mime
View raw message