Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-giraph-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-giraph-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A613D577 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 22:33:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92103 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2012 22:33:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-giraph-dev-archive@giraph.apache.org Received: (qmail 92062 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2012 22:33:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@giraph.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@giraph.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@giraph.apache.org Received: (qmail 92053 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2012 22:33:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-giraph-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 92046 invoked by uid 99); 7 Aug 2012 22:33:11 -0000 Received: from issues-vm.apache.org (HELO issues-vm) (140.211.11.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:33:11 +0000 Received: from isssues-vm.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by issues-vm (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA4C142822 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 22:33:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 22:33:10 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: giraph-dev@incubator.apache.org Message-ID: <1331431315.1766.1344378790791.JavaMail.jiratomcat@issues-vm> In-Reply-To: <4192876.36357.1342025854696.JavaMail.jiratomcat@issues-vm> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-246) Periodic worker calls to context.progress() will prevent timeout on some Hadoop clusters during barrier waits MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13430690#comment-13430690 ] Jakob Homan commented on GIRAPH-246: ------------------------------------ The PredicateLock stuff is fine, but according to Jaeho, doesn't seem to be working. Once the reason is nailed down, GIRAPH-274 can re-introduce it. > Periodic worker calls to context.progress() will prevent timeout on some Hadoop clusters during barrier waits > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GIRAPH-246 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-246 > Project: Giraph > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: bsp > Affects Versions: 0.2.0 > Reporter: Eli Reisman > Assignee: Eli Reisman > Priority: Minor > Labels: hadoop, patch > Fix For: 0.2.0 > > Attachments: GIRAPH-246-1.patch, GIRAPH-246-2.patch, GIRAPH-246-3.patch, GIRAPH-246-4.patch, GIRAPH-246-5.patch, GIRAPH-246-6.patch > > > This simple change creates a command-line configurable option in GiraphJob to control the time between calls to context().progress() that allows workers to avoid timeouts during long data load-ins in which some works complete their input split reads much faster than others, or finish a super step faster. I found this allowed jobs that were large-scale but with low memory overhead to complete even when they would previously time out during runs on a Hadoop cluster. Timeout is still possible when the worker crashes or runs out of memory or has other GC or RPC trouble that is legitimate, but prevents unintentional crashes when the worker is actually still healthy. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira