giraph-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jaeho Shin (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-277) Text Vertex Input/Output Format base classes overhaul
Date Mon, 06 Aug 2012 18:32:02 GMT


Jaeho Shin commented on GIRAPH-277:

I am trying with {{--no-prefix}}, {{--full-index}} (as mentioned in [reviewboard Issue 1918|])
and post-review with git svn, but all gives me the same error.  I think either my setup is
wrong (maybe git being to recent? 1.7.11) or reviewboard simply wants a diff that looks exactly
like one generated by svn.  I'll try adding {{(revision ...)}} and {{(working copy)}} manually
to the pathname lines.  Git's diff only has pathnames on those lines.

BTW, when you mentioned the how-to-contribute section, I thought you were talking about [the
wiki page|] and was puzzled.
 The {{--no-prefix}} was only described at the end of [Giraph's website|].
 The wiki contains a lot of outdated instructions from the incubator age, e.g., base repo
url.  I believe these duplicate/outdated docs should be cleaned up before they confuse too
many new users or developers.  Do we prefer to put more on the wiki or the web site?
> Text Vertex Input/Output Format base classes overhaul
> -----------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: GIRAPH-277
>                 URL:
>             Project: Giraph
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: examples, lib
>            Reporter: Jaeho Shin
>         Attachments: GIRAPH-277.patch
> The current way of implementing {{VertexInputFormat}} and {{VertexReader}} had bad smell.
 It required users to understand how these two classes are glued together, and forced similar
codes to be duplicated in every new input format.  (Similarly for the VertexOutputFormat and
VertexWriter.)  Anyone who wants to create a new format should create an underlying record
reader or writer at the right moment and delegate some calls to it, which seemed unnecessary
detail being exposed.  Besides, type parameters had to appear all over every new format code,
which was extremely annoying for both reading existing code and writing a new one.  I was
very frustrated writing my first format code especially when I compared it to writing a new
vertex code.  I thought writing a new input/output format should be as simple as vertex.
> So, I have refactored {{TextVertexInputFormat}} and {{OutputFormat}} into new forms that
have no difference in their interfaces, but remove a lot of burden for subclassing.  Instead
of providing static VertexReader base classes, I made it a non-static inner-class of its format
class, which helps eliminate the repeated code for gluing these two, already tightly coupled
classes.  This has additional advantage of eliminating all the Generics type variables on
the VertexReader side, which makes overall code much more concise.  I added several useful
TextVertexReader base classes that can save efforts for implementing line-oriented formats.
> Please comment if you see my proposed change have any impact on other aspects.  I'm unsure
of how these additional layers of abstraction could affect performance.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:


View raw message