Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-giraph-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-giraph-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30047D3A7 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 23:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72520 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2012 23:38:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-giraph-dev-archive@giraph.apache.org Received: (qmail 72463 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2012 23:38:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@giraph.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@giraph.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@giraph.apache.org Received: (qmail 72298 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2012 23:38:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-giraph-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 72224 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2012 23:38:34 -0000 Received: from issues-vm.apache.org (HELO issues-vm) (140.211.11.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 23:38:34 +0000 Received: from isssues-vm.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by issues-vm (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A4714281C for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 23:38:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 23:38:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Reisman (JIRA)" To: giraph-dev@incubator.apache.org Message-ID: <965860090.66821.1342568314750.JavaMail.jiratomcat@issues-vm> In-Reply-To: <714788634.41608.1342099594929.JavaMail.jiratomcat@issues-vm> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-249) Move part of the graph out-of-core when memory is low MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13416721#comment-13416721 ] Eli Reisman commented on GIRAPH-249: ------------------------------------ sorry formatting did not come out. so after cycling through the X healthy workers until X^2 partitionID's are assigned, this is the grouping from above as worker(owned partition id's): worker 1 (1, 6, 11, ...) worker 2 (2, 7, 12, ...) worker 3 (3, 8, 13, ...) hopefully thats a bit clearer. Anyway its in HashMasterPartitioner too > Move part of the graph out-of-core when memory is low > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GIRAPH-249 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-249 > Project: Giraph > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Alessandro Presta > Assignee: Alessandro Presta > Attachments: GIRAPH-249.patch, GIRAPH-249.patch, GIRAPH-249.patch, GIRAPH-249.patch, GIRAPH-249.patch > > > There has been some talk about Giraph's scaling limitations due to keeping the whole graph and messages in RAM. > We need to investigate methods to fall back to disk when running out of memory, while gracefully degrading performance. > This issue is for graph storage. Messages should probably be a separate issue, although the interplay between the two is crucial. > We should also discuss what are our primary goals here: completing a job (albeit slowly) instead of failing when the graph is too big, while still encouraging memory optimizations and high-memory clusters; or restructuring Giraph to be as efficient as possible in disk mode, making it almost a standard way of operating. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira