Mailing-List: contact xbean-dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: xbean-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Message-ID: <28329384.1187765670652.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: xbean-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (XBEAN-91) o.a.x.p.DateEditor.toObjectImpl throws
 exception when date format is in different locale than the default one
In-Reply-To: <30325886.1187735670938.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-91?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12521707 ] 

Guillaume Nodet commented on XBEAN-91:
--------------------------------------

Date parsing has always been a nightmare ...
The patch is fine for me and if nobody objects you sould just commit it ;-)

> o.a.x.p.DateEditor.toObjectImpl throws exception when date format is in different locale than the default one
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: XBEAN-91
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-91
>             Project: XBean
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: reflect
>    Affects Versions: 3.1
>            Reporter: Jacek Laskowski
>         Attachments: XBEAN-91.patch
>
>
> There's the expanded-env-entries sample that uses a date in Locale.US format with DateFormat.MEDIUM style. It didn't run well on Polish locale (pl) and XBean's org.apache.xbean.propertyeditor.DateEditorTest.testToObjectImpl kept throwing "java.text.ParseException: Unparseable date: "Mar 1, 1954"" exception.
> Attached is a patch for it. I'm not happy with it (I think it might've been written better), so I haven't applied it to the repo, but rather attach it here for others to look at it and correct where applicable.
> p.s. The "Unreleased Versions" contains 3.1 which should be 3.2, I guess.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.