Mailing-List: contact xbean-dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: xbean-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of gnodet@gmail.com designates
 64.233.184.236 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=eh3wMF7uVlsbpfRO8mkCQmjx2nQ5P1sXJGY8ypvk7cDPMqkcPtuj6P8ZaXVUZT4cZl6hvyxnj+KNqofh2a4t8i4Iv/QB2z+WHKhv0xF46zndgOJab+qi83jdoKE0zRth6euRXlEmeZB+PTOg603bjrzC69r8A4m6WgH84yV3Ymo=
Message-ID: <b23ecedc0612181244k6cc7620ared42af6ee0ca5f30@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 21:44:23 +0100
From: "Guillaume Nodet" <gnodet@gmail.com>
To: xbean-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 2.8
In-Reply-To: <D4C59B02-E518-46EE-9A32-AEA40B99985A@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <b23ecedc0612180825v31276633r2524ddf7aca251d3@mail.gmail.com>
	 <8457D2EB-BF31-46ED-9247-AB2875AEE65A@gmail.com>
	 <b23ecedc0612181031o2613eafbhd8935224ff39cbb2@mail.gmail.com>
	 <D4C59B02-E518-46EE-9A32-AEA40B99985A@gmail.com>

I've fixed the missing / bad ASF headers and use the new maven
plugin to generate LICENSE/NOTICE file.

On 12/18/06, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Dec 18, 2006, at 1:31 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
> > On 12/18/06, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Dec 18, 2006, at 11:25 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> >>
> >> > I'm starting a vote to release XBean 2.8.
> >> > There has not been much changes since 2.7, but a few
> >> > bugs fixed, and the addition of the xbean-finder module.
> >> > Anyway, the bugs are important enough to deserver a new
> >> > release (the generated schemas can not be validated).
> >> >
> >> > [ ] +1 Start xbean 2.8 release process
> >> > [ ] +/- 0
> >> > [ ] -1 Don't release xbean 2.8 now
> >> >
> >> > Here's my +1.
> >>
> >> Not sure what you mean by "release process".
> >
> > Running "mvn release:prepare release:perform" ;)
> >
> >> But here are the issues
> >> which look like they would block a release:
> >>
> >> 1. NOTICE files do not conform to current ASF standards
> >
> > What do you mean exactly ?
> > They have the same content that the ones I've always seen.
> > Could you point me to a better template for these ?
>
> Hi Guillaume,
>
> Yes, they've changed slightly... Source files no longer contain a
> copyright statement. Copyright is now in the notice file. Here's a
> pointer to the current "standards" -- http://www.apache.org/legal/src-
> headers.html
>
> Notice files take the following form:
>
>      Apache [PRODUCT_NAME]
>      Copyright [yyyy] The Apache Software Foundation
>
>      This product includes software developed at
>      The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>
> I don't see any external projects being included in xbean binaries.
> So, it would seem that's the only content that the NOTICE files would
> require.
>
> I took a peak at the generated jar files. Looks like license/notice
> files are missing from at least the following jar file:
>
> xbean-naming
>
> Genesis will automatically check for these during a build. Dain (I
> think) had a one line command to scan for missing notice/license
> files, but I can't remember how it went...
>
> >
> >> 2. The following files either do not contain a valid license header
> >> (not all files will require one, but many of these need one) or have
> >> an out-of-date license header (all need to be updated).
> >
> > Thanks. I'll fix these asap.
> > You run rat for that, right ?
>
> Yes, but rat doesn't identify old-style license headers. For these,
> I've found the following grep command to be useful:
>
> grep -RL --include=*.java "Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
> (ASF)" *
>
> --kevan
>
>
>
>


-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet