Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-xbean-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 39539 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2006 15:13:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Aug 2006 15:13:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 34397 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2006 15:13:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-xbean-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 34376 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2006 15:13:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xbean-dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: xbean-dev@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list xbean-dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 34367 invoked by uid 99); 18 Aug 2006 15:13:01 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 08:13:01 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of gnodet@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.190] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 08:13:00 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n29so1455563nfc for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 08:12:39 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dA5+YoXuz/zyCF15apDQl/HrYN1R99gwwOTTEhilvu0MR/FJr9JRbQZpXh1DiSA48h2PZ6OxvhI+U60IHLDlVrzfZfI4uzydEjDzr/KU8agB3Gv6hOqIDkWDkLwHWROhsvqdfOiHUXwEj2gAnGANuQUuH3dD79tcnleOJIilYdM= Received: by 10.49.91.6 with SMTP id t6mr4195457nfl; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 08:12:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.85.1 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 08:12:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:12:39 +0200 From: "Guillaume Nodet" To: xbean-dev@geronimo.apache.org, adc@toolazydogs.com Subject: Re: Colossus dot files In-Reply-To: <1418551085-1155913832-cardhu_blackberry.rim.net-391885104-@bwe017-cell00.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44E54634.7000900@toolazydogs.com> <1418551085-1155913832-cardhu_blackberry.rim.net-391885104-@bwe017-cell00.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Do you think that nobody will ever want to deploy xml files in a hot-deploy directory ? I would not bet on that ;) On 8/18/06, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > I like the idea of a single config file as well. > > I'm not too worried about file conflicts. I think that it will be highly unlikely. > > > Regards, > Alan > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Guillaume Nodet" > Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 09:55:32 > To:xbean-dev@geronimo.apache.org > Subject: Re: Colossus dot files > > Not sure. If you have to put such a file in the deploy dir, it may conflict > with files to deploy, or may confuse the user. > > I also think that a single configuration file would be handy, where all > directories would be configured. > > On 8/18/06, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > Why "hide" information in dot files? I personally prefer something like > > xbean-directive.xml so that when I jump into a directory I can plainly > > see what kind of shenanigans are going on. Just a thought. > > > > > > Regards, > > Alan > > > > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet