Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-xbean-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 69132 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2006 06:15:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Aug 2006 06:15:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 54523 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2006 06:15:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-xbean-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 54495 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2006 06:15:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xbean-dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: xbean-dev@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list xbean-dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 54486 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2006 06:15:18 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:15:18 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [72.10.46.63] (HELO as.toolazydogs.com) (72.10.46.63) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:15:17 -0700 Received: (qmail 9379 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2006 23:14:56 -0700 Received: from c-24-7-76-123.hsd1.ca.comcast.net (HELO ?192.168.226.26?) (24.7.76.123) by toolazydogs.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 23 Aug 2006 23:14:56 -0700 Message-ID: <44ED43D9.3000008@toolazydogs.com> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:14:49 -0700 From: "Alan D. Cabrera" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Macintosh/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xbean-dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: XBean and QDox References: <44ED3104.1000401@toolazydogs.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Yeah, that too... ;) Regards, Alan Guillaume Nodet wrote: > I'll give it a try with retrotranslator ... > > On 8/24/06, Alan Cabrera wrote: >> >> Fine for me as well given that retroweaver is so good. >> >> >> Regards, >> Alan >> >> David Blevins wrote: >> > Switching xbean-spring to java 5 is fine for me. >> > >> > On Aug 23, 2006, at 5:43 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >> > >> >> FYI, I started this thread, just before qdox 1.6 has been >> released, but >> >> take a look at http://joe.truemesh.com/blog/000642.html. >> >> >> >> But I think the discussion on shifting to java 5 and annotations is >> >> still valid. >> >> >> >> >> >> On 8/13/06, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >> >> It seems that nobody work on QDox since several months. >> >> (see http://www.nabble.com/Anyone-developing-QDox--tf705135r1.html ) >> >> Does anyone know of any replacement we could use to allow java 5 >> >> parsing ? >> >> >> >> I was thinking of introducing real annotations, but this would make >> >> xbean-spring >> >> JDK 5 specific. >> >> >> >> Any thoughts ? >> >> >> >> --Cheers, >> >> Guillaume Nodet >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --Cheers, >> >> Guillaume Nodet >> > >> >> > >