Mailing-List: contact xbean-dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: xbean-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
In-Reply-To: <B2CBFB8A-AD27-4129-AAE7-7F27A36E8592@visi.com>
References: <b23ecedc0608231344r73333a52xff967cc29c231e27@mail.gmail.com>
 <B2CBFB8A-AD27-4129-AAE7-7F27A36E8592@visi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <2992DD50-7278-4464-85C1-F3760CF589F1@iq80.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dain Sundstrom <dain@iq80.com>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Car maven plugin dedicated to G 1.1
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:13:27 -0700
To: xbean-dev@geronimo.apache.org

Does xbean need genesis?

-dain

On Aug 23, 2006, at 6:18 PM, David Blevins wrote:

> Do we really want xbean dependent on genesis?  Seems like it's not  
> working out too well.
>
> -David
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: "Guillaume Nodet" <gnodet@gmail.com>
>> Date: August 23, 2006 1:44:02 PM PDT
>> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Car maven plugin dedicated to G 1.1
>> Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
>>
>> I would totally agree with you if maven allows you to release  
>> something which
>> is dependant on a snapshot (even a plugin).  Which unfortunately  
>> is not the case ...
>>
>> Btw, a non snapshot release of genesis would be nice, because i'd  
>> like to
>> ask for a release of xbean (which is now dependant on genesis)
>> The xbean release is needed to release the jencks project which  
>> has been
>> updated to G 1.1, and which is a dependency of ServiceMix.   
>> ServiceMix also
>> depends on the snapshot car-plugin for G.
>> ... and I was hoping i would be able to ask for a ServiceMix  
>> release in a few
>> weeks ...
>>
>> Seriously, i can put it anywhere you want, but i really need a  
>> released
>> version asap, and not have to wait 3 or 4 months until 1.1.2 is  
>> shipped.
>>
>> Well, i always have the possibility to build it and deploy it in  
>> ServiceMix
>> private repo under a timestamped version (but not a snapshots).
>> But I'm sure i'm not the only one in this case and I'd rather do it
>> the right way.
>>
>>
>> On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote: I think we  
>> just add it to 1.1, leave it as a snapshot plugin for the
>> moment, and then release it when 1.1.2 rolls out.
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Aug 23, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>
>> > -1 on adding it to 1.1.1.   Put it in 1.1.2.  1.1.1 has been
>> > delayed for a few weeks for minor changes.
>> >
>> > Jason Dillon wrote:
>> >> On Aug 22, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>> >>> On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon < jason@planet57.com> wrote:
>> >>> Its probably not going to go into 1.1.1 unless you have it done
>> >>> right now and all is good... but defs for 1.1.2.
>> >>>
>> >>> It's done and it works for my plugins.  That does not mean there
>> >>> is no bugs.
>> >> Mkay... so lets add it to branches/1.1, merge to 1.1.1 and include
>> >> it in the release.
>> >>> But we could always make a 1.1.1.1 with just that addition of the
>> >>> plugin.
>> >>>
>> >>> Do you volunteer do release the full geronimo server, just to
>> >>> include a plugin,
>> >>> which would btw not be included in the distribution itself ?
>> >> I'm not gonna volunteer to do any m1 related stuff :-P  m2 stuff
>> >> is killing me asis... :-\
>> >> --jason
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet