geronimo-xbean-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Car maven plugin dedicated to G 1.1
Date Thu, 24 Aug 2006 04:49:16 GMT
Good question.  What is genesis?  Did I miss an RTC vote?


Regards,
Alan

Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> Does xbean need genesis?
>
> -dain
>
> On Aug 23, 2006, at 6:18 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>> Do we really want xbean dependent on genesis?  Seems like it's not 
>> working out too well.
>>
>> -David
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> From: "Guillaume Nodet" <gnodet@gmail.com>
>>> Date: August 23, 2006 1:44:02 PM PDT
>>> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Car maven plugin dedicated to G 1.1
>>> Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
>>>
>>> I would totally agree with you if maven allows you to release 
>>> something which
>>> is dependant on a snapshot (even a plugin).  Which unfortunately is 
>>> not the case ...
>>>
>>> Btw, a non snapshot release of genesis would be nice, because i'd 
>>> like to
>>> ask for a release of xbean (which is now dependant on genesis)
>>> The xbean release is needed to release the jencks project which has 
>>> been
>>> updated to G 1.1, and which is a dependency of ServiceMix.  
>>> ServiceMix also
>>> depends on the snapshot car-plugin for G.
>>> ... and I was hoping i would be able to ask for a ServiceMix release 
>>> in a few
>>> weeks ...
>>>
>>> Seriously, i can put it anywhere you want, but i really need a released
>>> version asap, and not have to wait 3 or 4 months until 1.1.2 is 
>>> shipped.
>>>
>>> Well, i always have the possibility to build it and deploy it in 
>>> ServiceMix
>>> private repo under a timestamped version (but not a snapshots).
>>> But I'm sure i'm not the only one in this case and I'd rather do it
>>> the right way.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote: I think we just 
>>> add it to 1.1, leave it as a snapshot plugin for the
>>> moment, and then release it when 1.1.2 rolls out.
>>>
>>> --jason
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 23, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>>
>>> > -1 on adding it to 1.1.1.   Put it in 1.1.2.  1.1.1 has been
>>> > delayed for a few weeks for minor changes.
>>> >
>>> > Jason Dillon wrote:
>>> >> On Aug 22, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>> >>> On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon < jason@planet57.com> wrote:
>>> >>> Its probably not going to go into 1.1.1 unless you have it done
>>> >>> right now and all is good... but defs for 1.1.2.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> It's done and it works for my plugins.  That does not mean there
>>> >>> is no bugs.
>>> >> Mkay... so lets add it to branches/1.1, merge to 1.1.1 and include
>>> >> it in the release.
>>> >>> But we could always make a 1.1.1.1 with just that addition of the
>>> >>> plugin.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Do you volunteer do release the full geronimo server, just to
>>> >>> include a plugin,
>>> >>> which would btw not be included in the distribution itself ?
>>> >> I'm not gonna volunteer to do any m1 related stuff :-P  m2 stuff
>>> >> is killing me asis... :-\
>>> >> --jason
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>


Mime
View raw message