geronimo-xbean-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>
Subject Re: Release XBean 2.6 ?
Date Sun, 27 Aug 2006 21:34:16 GMT
Yes, I suppose that Genesis 1.0 needs to be voted.  I was thinking  
about it as I was doing it too... though if we had a vote then it  
would certainly push back the ability to release xbean on monday...  
at least a week.

--jason


On Aug 27, 2006, at 10:22 AM, David Jencks wrote:

> Don't we have to vote on something we are thinking of releasing to  
> ibiblio?
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Aug 27, 2006, at 5:18 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> So, I just finished the release of Genesis 1.0.  I'm testing that  
>> xbean builds okay with this as the parent to its top-level pom,  
>> which I expect it will.
>>
>> One caveat though... Genesis 1.0 artifacts are only available on  
>> the m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository repo.  I am not sure how or when  
>> these artifacts are published to the central m2 repo mirrors.  So  
>> to build, I had to add this repository manually:
>>
>>     <repository>
>>         <id>apache</id>
>>         <name>Apache Repository</name>
>>         <url>http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync- 
>> repository</url>
>>         <layout>default</layout>
>>         <snapshots>
>>             <enabled>false</enabled>
>>         </snapshots>
>>         <releases>
>>             <enabled>true</enabled>
>>         </releases>
>>     </repository>
>>
>> I had previously had these configured by default, but was told  
>> that these are not expected to be used as real repositories, and  
>> so I removed them.  I'm considering adding a release environment  
>> profile that brings them back, so that a release can be made in  
>> the interim while waiting for the artifacts to propagate to mirrors.
>>
>> I will ping repository@ and see what they have to say about the  
>> sync.  I've heard a few times that its manual... which is lame IMO.
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Aug 25, 2006, at 12:40 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>
>>> Jason is about to release genesis this weekend.
>>> I' ll make the release on monday.
>>>
>>> On 8/25/06, Dain Sundstrom <dain@iq80.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> What is going on with 2.6?
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to cut it and get on to 2.7.
>>>>
>>>> -dain
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 23, 2006, at 11:40 PM, James Strachan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > On 8/22/06, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >> I'd like to release XBean 2.6 asap.
>>>> >
>>>> > +1
>>>> >
>>>> >> I wanted to delay it until qdox 1.6 is out, which is now done.
>>>> >> Unfortunately, it is compiled with JDK 5, and thus i think we
>>>> >> can not use it, unless we all agree to put a JDK 5 dependency
>>>> >> at compilation time (as qdox is only used to generate the  
>>>> mapping).
>>>> >
>>>> > Sounds fine to me.
>>>> >
>>>> >> There is also one JIRA in RTC about the classloader module, so
>>>> >> if people could vote on it ... Or should be delay it until next
>>>> >> release ?
>>>> >
>>>> > We could always release again after that classloader fix - but  
>>>> could
>>>> > folks on the PMC take a look and vote please?
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> >
>>>> > James
>>>> > -------
>>>> > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>
>


Mime
View raw message