Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F8C0C3A1 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 02:32:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35705 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2012 02:32:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 35206 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2012 02:32:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: user@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list user@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 35173 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2012 02:32:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 02:32:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.136.44.60] (HELO smtp105.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (98.136.44.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 02:32:09 +0000 Received: (qmail 78746 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2012 02:31:48 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:From:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:To:References:Message-Id:X-Mailer; b=yMSup5D3dXCQTedMNkAG1cFF8c4v9qL9aEYgeJorFyheJ2KNn6S3AD9lTrDhjnxH8Au89PDaxzKwkmv7n0BbPiUtrQ2glD98tbKBvNoDgcxfRSvnHF3pTk9nO+7O9A/6hoQFLCLo6p7FZSVPM6ZxL4dgtHZ32P9+JKdHzJUM+Lc= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1340850708; bh=Tg475c/7LDRYmJbOy+Jzxh4ICMf5H4cN8zZr5grGmMU=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:From:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:To:References:Message-Id:X-Mailer; b=WyAQ6XwC8feSB3LFk24/reDFfqgVup2rGxsJUBV6n9tQkr8gpvDF+jnh2kWNjbVHLhfAQ+PTr7PRaZTF0S/Esrz2UiOOhRI2T6Gb/gnqHUOkB4w09vLK/FHbJFcYIchpbmktIxST3igSSLm2OhFnfIJ5Gx4nC53ElMVUnjTgAtY= X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: hSxcubcVM1khuUyhBnzuV5iSy36DFlrthqa47Lk3aZ5yw8y E6Z9JDYi4BVBWLK2aQl3KcnL6SrttOFJz6AZB0nhkQp9ReUJFAD708CgvOJ3 m721RqJPE1a.6_2M3T3bH8DG3VOFuvofxGtL_8AhH0APYUSgZjgEEEQqEhjO _nYzTEcgqgKDGRu_RwBWLwTy5JJT5QQSWBouw1i6FyEcVC8rLCIPHdcpE3Jg iSDunCSV9lsKyi7hhaMppxT9eQdF9PPb.jBqIRUyYUHT1fD1dAokqnpSehYN Qm5umJRYgQ7E44TnTEyi5vZ94b3gOdFDBUZsYkYbY6iGhyZR0uKN.H8L6fk6 ctxCRNHhat_onh.e1ScigWfACsf6nV7fKpPXyS3o2TSslhYTcpn5udYvS2Ho CaiF.0pAy2582vv8NwqLUqcxZCq.OK2VAjKDuLP3JpFFnRaJhW.fXk0y3cV8 .zV4Bjt1aEZqjZWG7SS2B.jmdWAYK8axa5REdWTN6z5fbgk7vjw3Y2wKvYZG bKLiIK0IGt9JNV0bUCv79j.IdJBvzsyxZSEmn3UuANVvAhnoetDoyqUX2zbR lkN4ZSLCJgzVeJdWokLyv7OKYc8eyVjYjllkFKYCXZJijJnTZAiEusK_hXum X3ZveCGZ1GFqpSz.0GKMhdYeVnDrrew-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: .9oIUzyswBANsYgUm_5uPui0skTnzGJXJQ-- Received: from [10.0.1.6] (david_jencks@98.246.196.64 with plain) by smtp105.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Jun 2012 19:31:48 -0700 PDT From: David Jencks Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-3--381228321 Subject: Re: [discussion]Time to release to Geronimo 2.2.2 ? Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 19:31:48 -0700 In-Reply-To: To: user@geronimo.apache.org References: Message-Id: <442BEFF2-1C4E-4817-84A6-0E8B0D14B0D5@yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-3--381228321 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I recently fixed some of my misinterpretations of the jaspic spec in = 3.0, and these should be ported back to 2.2.x. thanks david jencks On Jun 27, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote: > We had some discussion with a user request [1], The initial thought = from me is to include the security patches since G2.2.1 and pull in the = recent openejb 3.1.5 clustering changes.=20 >=20 > But it seems openejb 3.1.5 is not ready now, we have to hold until = openejb is in a good shape. In this period, we at least can clean = other things for G2.2.2, I'd like to use this thread to hear the voice = on what else we might want to put into Geronimo 2.2.2. >=20 > = [1]http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/Request-for-Geronimo-2-2-2-= Release-td3985045.html >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Shawn --Apple-Mail-3--381228321 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii I recently fixed some of my misinterpretations of the jaspic spec in 3.0, and these should be ported back to 2.2.x.

thanks
david jencks

On Jun 27, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:

We had some discussion with a user request [1], The initial thought from me is to include the security patches since G2.2.1 and pull in the recent openejb 3.1.5 clustering changes. 

But it seems openejb 3.1.5 is not ready now, we have to hold until openejb is in a good shape.   In this period,  we at least can clean other things for G2.2.2,  I'd like to use this thread to hear the voice on what else we might want to put into Geronimo 2.2.2.




--
Shawn

--Apple-Mail-3--381228321--