Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 42433 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2011 16:06:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2011 16:06:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 23399 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2011 16:06:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 23358 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2011 16:06:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: user@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list user@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 23351 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2011 16:06:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 16:06:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kevan.miller@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.182] (HELO mail-gx0-f182.google.com) (209.85.161.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 16:06:08 +0000 Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so716633gxk.13 for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 09:05:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=SislnBZD8pXTL/gfg6HLI4ry+zHukOIYWwlxvdd0e98=; b=LzAtaOw10d8TMlCHJlkVc5eAYG8odBRtRfJedTZz/HiD9eQQ0m1G+IwWpZZJiCIz2b m2DATAMGL3dqkQQYZ8hoOwGV1x/3YgyiQ/SOk5Cz5keOVEncLf5l4kBr5NELc4JULMpO Vzgu2dGx/iR91Ki6Xvb41UJv6mWZXBRv4F5xs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=q+3g7gkDqSLJHRY43XVZfWq7FGHT3xcvd8xePMLH5gz3gDqofGEMwLJ9C8uX+Dfeva oiXRJQSSnPD05RRBYOB60/GEMOy9CAo2nf80h7/38EyusRHyG0yiD+9X3AyyJJzC4V9Y JDBi64ZR07FP4GhyAsyi5ZM2s41ce5L6OtxuQ= Received: by 10.236.174.7 with SMTP id w7mr693070yhl.487.1302105947865; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 09:05:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.193] (cpe-066-057-037-066.nc.res.rr.com [66.57.37.66]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 41sm252199yhl.23.2011.04.06.09.05.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 06 Apr 2011 09:05:46 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Geronimo 3.0 release timing? From: Kevan Miller In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 12:05:44 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3AD778CA-339E-4746-9943-8777BA2FAD46@gmail.com> References: To: user@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Apr 1, 2011, at 2:35 PM, Si Chen wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I really like the new Geronimo 3.0 and your OSGi support. We'd love = to use it for the next version of opentaps! >=20 > Could anyone give me a rough idea of when 3.0 might be released? I'd say we're looking at 2 months. >=20 > Also, will 3.0M2 be released soon? M2 was slowed down a bit by TCK issues. Some question in my mind about = what to do with it... I'd be in favor of cutting a new M2 branch from = current trunk. Or just keep working on 3.0... --kevan=