Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40123 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2010 21:58:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Sep 2010 21:58:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 58881 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2010 21:58:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 58748 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2010 21:58:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: user@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list user@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 58741 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2010 21:58:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:58:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of daniel.haischt@googlemail.com designates 209.85.216.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.175] (HELO mail-qy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.216.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:58:23 +0000 Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30so1705691qyk.13 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:58:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sp1s9ORlJ5/SOA/cN3nHUSW8Zcto/IGu8fLFQCe83vs=; b=thWaigLrbFz3XfaxYmi2tsosLi7BpZOmr8kkq/uxWcMEMdfCadpDSaoBxmP8lxjVml uXn7H4FjK43suTwNNw3iUBJaYRghcHLgjpE9KYddkZdK32UK5JjOPKflLJ+Mel7ZjrNx kpfsUMpkCp8Fm/OOsCIe0FdCamzcs17j2WgQU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=iwMlGXPT6wH0d7e++jihobjqMZeYH1M5p3Gz6r0ysJQuZxOvZ+Dy6ZMiURpnRD1H/w NfJohjcc4WYz5kZ1HZl1lHZrlIjlpZckGXQCdzIoDSGPpBWjumbcnQ66TSbwdmtfOIeH 1K3PB9dStENIalDVd0ZGpks77KtCwo8L+i+CM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.73.134 with SMTP id q6mr1701979qaj.65.1285797481088; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:58:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.129.205 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:58:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <263562C4-B5C7-40C6-9858-9D64220B8264@gmail.com> References: <263562C4-B5C7-40C6-9858-9D64220B8264@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:58:01 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to generate schema logical diagram on Geronimo website? From: dsh To: user@geronimo.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable That's how the geronimo tomcat XSD looks like if I load it into the oxygen editor and export it as HTML: -> http://people.apache.org/~dsh/geronimo-tomcat-2.0.1.html Cheers Daniel On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Kevan Miller wro= te: > > On Sep 29, 2010, at 5:00 PM, dsh wrote: > >> I know XMLSpy does such diagrams, the Oxygen XML editor does them too >> and probably some kind of Eclipse plugins as well. > > Looks like it was Oxygen: > > > On Jan 29, 2008, at 9:00 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote: > >> Hey Tim, >> If you mean those over http://geronimo.apache.org/schemas-2.1/docs/ =A0(= they are still baking ;-) =A0) >> Most of it is generated with Oxygen, just testing it for now but so far = I like the way it presents the info the most compared to other XSD document= ation tools. But Oxygen is not the whole story there is a lot of additional= "home cooking" to make it look the way it looks there. >> >> Cheers! >> Hernan >> >> Tim McConnell wrote: >>> Howdy to you too Hernan, I really like the HTML and schemaDiagrams you'= re providing for those of us who are XSD-impaired. Just curious what tool(s= ) you're using to generate them ?? >>> Hernan Cunico wrote: >>>> Howdy, >>>> I'm working on documenting the deployment plans for 2.1, part of that = documentation includes covering the XML schemas. >>>> >>>> While looking at the schemas I see attributes-1.1.xsd and attributes-1= .2.xsd although I haven't found any reference to attributes-1.1. Are we sti= ll using this schema? >>>> >>>> Cheers! >>>> Hernan >>>> >