Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 35195 invoked from network); 26 May 2010 13:04:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 May 2010 13:04:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 66868 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2010 13:04:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 66819 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2010 13:04:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: user@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list user@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 66810 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2010 13:04:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 13:04:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lukasz.budnik@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.54 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.54] (HELO mail-gw0-f54.google.com) (74.125.83.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 13:04:07 +0000 Received: by gwj21 with SMTP id 21so236505gwj.13 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 06:03:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iDJ6KP/QBhSBvvM20gJ+uXGM8MCPi+2JjJQC5E4ivSw=; b=NN5/QvVhirSntxgMgQpZJ5ZlTqXozK/UFqfWGTPdnK/zfSDaS7YPHq8fmNRyBzqeL7 Qdgixe8vXmtEbuCYyk/ChEubPM6EXHZIwrPjeiV33ZQj0shbCBt44j5lwvOJjD4B88La sks3AE5gZjBNwJd7JOZSmAOaitcIGTSPtt39k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=fRFjeynP7OIcifbx+QUep+yQiiPKhiDjnB62ybGnp8S/C2085a2tDXwHPMGAMl9PSy mjQZjrreadWJVlAPg7NFWluMFX/xwdCD2RlsX/Fu/8UcMIAKCNDIXcTNoHHySrypEkh9 e5u3IvH2TZ4DznDXr9AKzKKY5GkSb4YKWf8MQ= Received: by 10.150.208.15 with SMTP id f15mr8928745ybg.8.1274879024255; Wed, 26 May 2010 06:03:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.226.12 with HTTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 06:03:24 -0700 (PDT) From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=81ukasz_Budnik?= Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 15:03:24 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: very, very, very slow start of tomcat6 car To: user@geronimo.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, I have been migrating my application from G 2.1.3 to G 2.1.4 and today I have finally migrated the production environment. But I have one pretty annoying issue. In dev both G2.1.3 and G2.1.4 start Tomcat module in a reasonable time. But in production the start time is always ~2 minutes! For example: xh@apl05:/opt/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.1.4/bin# tail -f /opt/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.1.4/var/log/geronimo.out Module 16/67 org.apache.geronimo.configs/activemq-broker/2.1.4/car started in .601s Module 17/67 org.apache.geronimo.configs/openjpa/2.1.4/car started in .000s Module 18/67 org.apache.geronimo.configs/webservices-common/2.1.4/car started in .000s Module 19/67 org.apache.geronimo.configs/openejb/2.1.4/car started in .250s Module 20/67 org.apache.geronimo.configs/axis/2.1.4/car started in .050s Module 21/67 org.apache.geronimo.configs/axis2/2.1.4/car started in .000s Module 22/67 org.apache.geronimo.configs/axis2-ejb/2.1.4/car started in .000s Module 23/67 org.apache.geronimo.configs/j2ee-corba-yoko/2.1.4/car started in .452s Module 24/67 org.apache.geronimo.configs/jasper/2.1.4/car started in .000s Module 25/67 org.apache.geronimo.configs/tomcat6/2.1.4/car started in 2:34.440s Module 26/67 org.apache.geronimo.configs/tomcat6-no-ha/2.1.4/car started in .000s 2:34.440s? Give me a break... Just for comparison: My dev machine is a laptop with Windows 3 GB and Intel Core Duo @ 2.20GHz. In production I have Linux 64 bits with 16 GB and 8 x Intel Xeon @ 2.50GHz. Am I the only one experiencing this kind of issue? cheers, =C5=81ukasz