From user-return-13700-apmail-geronimo-user-archive=geronimo.apache.org@geronimo.apache.org Fri Jul 24 13:58:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 59657 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 13:58:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 13:58:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 42301 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 13:59:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 42229 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 13:59:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: user@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list user@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 42221 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 13:59:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:59:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kevan.miller@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.192 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.192] (HELO mail-yx0-f192.google.com) (209.85.210.192) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:59:19 +0000 Received: by yxe30 with SMTP id 30so3117454yxe.27 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 06:58:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; bh=WTvdhQ95vqPQMqSRYxt1/TW07otFAGlIwYosazqpZ9Q=; b=FjdAv1hPG0LXz7CMUuvUmsWsfiHBNowUyk5POgydg7wsEb/AOZUYPd77/Po9ri2kgc goSKHenQrjdOewncy/w9Ggg3n8UWBrQBH0KsIiXJwbRqPu7cGRKEK3Z0qvWBwTDo4fUb IOEXzOf5sr9Bnj0hqrV4yaqYNPd/XC61PTrCs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:mime-version:subject :date:references:x-mailer; b=lKQ377n7xGlqjkXKMLCt0K6q1LK0aRwF7COG/V7RVf+ZBcH/3kYww2Dx1AGMaXie72 F+HPA9vVDNZy2rnIjwv3Vwb8/rqKM2V+4uiFgTuEafwwNxyE0KqByPooCet3OdXwWoJT 30YvxHFyHySMN3Bbx9yApmlb6Uu6Q0LPUkSr0= Received: by 10.90.29.13 with SMTP id c13mr2893926agc.107.1248443938328; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 06:58:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.1.7? (cpe-076-182-095-055.nc.res.rr.com [76.182.95.55]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm8834492agb.36.2009.07.24.06.58.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 24 Jul 2009 06:58:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <21579E2A-D662-4AFE-A2A4-B7B107008F0A@gmail.com> From: Kevan Miller To: user@geronimo.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-8--446203023 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: Problem with Eclipse Galileo Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:58:56 -0400 References: <4A4BD493.8020004@apache.org> <98a659de0907020158q513765c8t6b6622b9567c9da5@mail.gmail.com> <4A4CF725.2030503@apache.org> <24584264.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-8--446203023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Jul 24, 2009, at 9:40 AM, Delos wrote: > Kevan, > > Currently, user can get GEP with Galileo support from http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/2.1.5/ > > But I agree with you to deliver a GEP release supporting Galileo. > > Can we just update current 2.1.4 release? No. > > Because there is no 2.1.5 release for server now, I think it's not > proper to distribute a GEP 2.1.5 release. > > What's your opinion? There's no requirement to keep GEP and Server in-sync, with regard to release numbers. Lack of a 2.1.5 server release should not prohibit a release of GEP. That said, we are going to be working on a 2.1.5 server release. If we want to coordinate a GEP release along with that, that's fine with me... --kevan --Apple-Mail-8--446203023 Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Jul 24, 2009, = at 9:40 AM, Delos wrote:

Kevan,

Currently, user can get GEP with Galileo = support from http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/2= .1.5/

But I agree with = you to deliver a GEP release supporting Galileo.

Can we just = update current 2.1.4 = release?

No.


Because there is no 2.1.5 release for server now, I = think it's not proper to distribute a GEP 2.1.5 release.

What's = your opinion?

There's = no requirement to keep GEP and Server in-sync, with regard to release = numbers. Lack of a 2.1.5 server release should not prohibit a release of = GEP. That said, we are going to be working on a 2.1.5 server release. If = we want to coordinate a GEP release along with that, that's fine with = me...

--kevan
= --Apple-Mail-8--446203023--