Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16110 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2009 06:49:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2009 06:49:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 13485 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2009 06:49:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 12955 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2009 06:49:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: user@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list user@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 12946 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2009 06:49:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:49:05 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:48:56 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LgvlT-0007nn-Nm for user@geronimo.apache.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:48:35 -0700 Message-ID: <22428916.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 23:48:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Jaikiran To: user@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: your current Geronimo evaluation In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: jai_forums2005@yahoo.co.in References: <22329850.post@talk.nabble.com> <22357416.post@talk.nabble.com> <22373133.post@talk.nabble.com> <22411656.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org djencks wrote: > > > Anyway, I think you should try out the servers you think are > interesting and see which one(s) fit your requirements and style of > work. This is not really the place to discuss the advantages or > disadvantages of JBoss. You can easily deploy simple apps on any app > server. To me it seems more interesting to ask how the app server > fits into the software development and maintenance workflow. For > instance, how much of the server configuration easily fits in scm and > how does it get from scm to the developer, qa, and production > servers? > david jencks > +10 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/your-current-Geronimo-evaluation-tp22329850s134p22428916.html Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.