Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 34737 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2008 17:27:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Sep 2008 17:27:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 2088 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2008 17:27:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 1551 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2008 17:27:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: user@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list user@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 1540 invoked by uid 99); 11 Sep 2008 17:27:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:27:10 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:26:11 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KdpwH-0003aJ-TY for user@geronimo.apache.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:26:41 -0700 Message-ID: <19440108.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:26:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Kory Markevich To: user@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Eclipse Utility Projects with 2.1.2 In-Reply-To: <5C24F0B7-9861-4398-A8D3-B2FDAFBA9472@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: Kory_Markevich@ACL.com References: <19402144.post@talk.nabble.com> <48C7C8B1.1050504@gmail.com> <19415054.post@talk.nabble.com> <48C83E89.4020803@gmail.com> <19424830.post@talk.nabble.com> <5C24F0B7-9861-4398-A8D3-B2FDAFBA9472@yahoo.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Well, Eclipse assists by having utility projects. From the WTP documentation: An enterprise application can contain utility JAR files that are to be used by the contained modules. This allows sharing of code at the application level by multiple Web, EJB, or application client modules. These JAR files are commonly referred to as utility JAR files. The utility JAR files defined for an enterprise application project can be actual JAR files in the project, or you can include utility Java projects that are designated to become the utility JAR files during assembly and deployment. So it sounds to me that having the geronimo-service.xml in such projects in the first place was a mistake, as these projects are not meant to be deployed by themselves. I don't think the JIRA Tim mentioned should have removed support for utility projects altogether, just geronimo-service.xml. Now I know that geronimo has it's own robust module support, but since that's not exposed to Eclipse directly I'd like to use utility projects. Should I create a JIRA to get this support back in? djencks wrote: > > > I don't know how eclipse assists with this but you can include > configuration for gbeans in any kind of geronimo plan, including that > for ears (geronimo-application.xml or external plan), ejb modules > (openejb-jar.xml), or web modules (geronimo-web.xml). META-INF/ > geronimo-service.xml would only get detected if you were deploying a > jar directly not as a javaee application. > > Generally gbean config is at the end of the plan after all the javaee > stuff. > > thanks > david jencks > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Eclipse-Utility-Projects-with-2.1.2-tp19402144s134p19440108.html Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.