geronimo-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Woods <>
Subject Re: Geronimo support stories
Date Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:33:01 GMT
BTW - here is a Powered by page already in our wiki (but not in the nav 
links) that I created awhile back -

Everyone, feel free to edit as we flush out this idea.


Kevan Miller wrote:
> On Aug 8, 2008, at 3:40 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>> I'd prefer a new link under the Community leftnav and one or more 
>> pages behind it in our existing GMOxSITE wiki.
> Sounds good to me. 
>> Kevan Miller wrote:
>>> On Aug 7, 2008, at 8:15 AM, weberj wrote:
>>>> For Glassfish there are several sucess stories: 
>>>> Are there for Geronimo / wasce too? If not, I suggest to collect in 
>>>> the Wiki
>>>> like this page:
>>>> Pointy haired bosses will rather decide in favor of Geronimo if you 
>>>> can show
>>>> them that BigMegaCorp is using Geronimo with a zillion transactions 
>>>> a day.
>>> Heh. Thanks for the imagery. :-)
>>> I totally agree. We recently received a request for the same 
>>> information. How do others feel? I'd like to hear from users, 
>>> committers, and, of course, our PMC members.
>>> There are several different possible categories:
>>> Users of Geronimo (Geronimo server, Geronimo components, etc)
>>> Applications/Plugins that run on Geronimo
>>> Projects/companies that bundle, repackage, or support Geronimo in 
>>> some manner.
>>> Information could be located either on our web site (e.g. 
>>> or our Wiki (e.g. 
>>> Here are a few projects which maintain similar pages:
>>> ActiveMQ --
>>> Tomcat --
>>> We'll need a process for how information is added to this list. I see 
>>> the following scenarios:
>>> 1) Information is volunteered to the project by interested parties 
>>> (e.g. a user sends information to our user@ list about how they are 
>>> using Geronimo)
>>> 2) Usage information is publicly announced -- web site, publication, 
>>> press release, etc.
>>> I would be in favor of both scenarios.
>>> Do we need any guidelines on content? Should we allow images, limit 
>>> the amount of text, limit the amount of hype/marketing?
>>> Personally, I'd rather not spin cycles in being too precise in 
>>> creating guidelines. I'd prefer to see a CTR process -- if someone 
>>> finds an entry objectionable, then simply register the complaint. The 
>>> offending entry should be removed until all issues have been addressed.
>>> Anything else that should be included in this discussion?
>>> --kevan

View raw message