Jacek Laskowski wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Beniamin Mazan wrote: > > Please copy/paste the subject at the very least so there's anything to > respond to. Care to negotiate? ;-) > > I haven't seen anybody who has tried to change OpenJPA (the default > JPA engine in Geronimo) to Hibernate as a default JPA provider, but > Hibernate works fine when specified in provider in persistence.xml. > The only drawback of specyfing it in the aforementioned file > is...well...having to specify it explicitly. Not much, but could be > less of course. I think it'd be a good exercise to find out how much > effort changing OpenJPA to Hibernate would require. Perhaps not an > easy task but definitely doable. > > Jacek > > -- > Jacek Laskowski > Notatnik Projektanta Java EE - http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl > > Thanks Jacek, I'll try to use H in the way you described. I've found too much cases of strange behaviour of OpenJPA. ----- thanks Beniamin -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Could-I-use-Hibernate-as-default-persistence-engine-with-Geronimo-2.1--tp18315223s134p18317334.html Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.