Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 70104 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2008 15:04:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jun 2008 15:04:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 35183 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2008 15:04:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 35159 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2008 15:04:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: user@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list user@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 35148 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2008 15:04:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Jun 2008 08:04:50 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of josephcleong@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.28 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.46.28] (HELO yw-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.46.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:03:54 +0000 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 2so628157ywt.85 for ; Fri, 06 Jun 2008 08:04:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=OzM7U6FI9KjoWQIURWm8GSfYslN0XghARBRQec303Dw=; b=Vnx7U622fQnlQBL+aI45G5LMl/Td94c1n8y6hqwL9FDdklfZiHZzTEgXpfNu0GyhAN gCKd2lAYDrO8htT/ZQupb/D6VPInxQNL65S0MSpWowpUA87UNAOpd/otK6JwQjfHgnUp hDaEWsMlKC4Fva55b3v+9bzxIomIZTMv+3yqU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=OmSphJRws2CRtb+b5I/Db3yjUsg66WizatKwTQVra0gkIyjXinhXNlTxexqclUQnGq 6YpD3QLuiqwel70vCttu5xMteakIQdvO7xYP88TKGHPFQd3H6VPNw96pfMr4IEY5krnb gQNy+3ELT3RrmoHvP9RD8T469ggZ0SsFMro94= Received: by 10.151.108.13 with SMTP id k13mr378049ybm.116.1212764652680; Fri, 06 Jun 2008 08:04:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.135.19 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 08:04:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 11:04:12 -0400 From: "Joseph Leong" To: user@geronimo.apache.org, dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Upgrading to Dojo 1.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_6620_29420116.1212764652663" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_6620_29420116.1212764652663 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi everyone, I've been tossing the idea around in my head of taking the initiative to upgrade the current items written in Dojo to 1.1.1, I know we still have some Dojo 0.4.3, which isn't supported anymore, in use and there has been vast improvements with their new Dijit package for widgets among many other items. Also, with some recently reported JIRAs about accessibility compatibility being an issue in these Dojo components we can make use of the a11y available in it. Overall, i also think we might also benefit a cleaner setup from streamlining our versions in terms of future development and maintenance as well. Although I haven't looked in complete detail in each of the AG Dojo pieces, i know that the 0.4.3 transition to 1.1.1 will take some work because the widget system has been separated out to it's own pieces (diji) and so simple work arounds will not do. That is, this will be a big block change rather than an incremental one. Does anyone have any thoughts - one way or the other on this undertaking? Thanks! Joseph Leong ------=_Part_6620_29420116.1212764652663 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi everyone,

I've been tossing the idea around in my head of taking the initiative to upgrade the current items written in Dojo to 1.1.1, I know we still have some Dojo 0.4.3, which isn't supported anymore, in use and there has been vast improvements with their new Dijit package for widgets among many other items.  Also, with some recently reported JIRAs about accessibility compatibility being an issue in these Dojo components we can make use of the a11y available in it.  Overall, i also think we might also benefit a cleaner setup from streamlining our versions  in terms of future development and maintenance as well.

Although I haven't looked in complete detail in each of the AG Dojo pieces, i know that the 0.4.3 transition to 1.1.1 will take some work because the widget system has been separated out to it's own pieces (diji) and so simple work arounds will not do.  That is, this will be a big block change rather than an incremental one.

Does anyone have any thoughts - one way or the other on this undertaking?


Thanks!
Joseph Leong
------=_Part_6620_29420116.1212764652663--