geronimo-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jochen Zink <jochenl...@web.de>
Subject Re: Maybe a ActiveMQ Bug?
Date Thu, 05 Jun 2008 06:35:28 GMT
Thanks a lot! Great support!

Regards
Jochen

> -----Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: "Kevan Miller" <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
> Gesendet: 04.06.08 17:38:55
> An: user@geronimo.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Maybe a ActiveMQ Bug?


> 
> On Jun 4, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Jochen Zink wrote:
> 
> > Are you sure, that geronimo 2.1.1 contains the fixed Version of  
> > ActiveMQ? The BuckTrackingEntry apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1215  
> > says, the bug is fixed in Version 5.1. But Geronimo 2.1.1 contains  
> > Version 4.1.2?
> 
> Hi Jochen,
> Heh. Yes, I noticed that, also. That's a Jira oversight, I think.  
> Perhaps the bug was fixed in 5.1 and then merged back into the 4.1.x  
> code stream. Originally, there wasn't going to be another 4.1.x  
> release after 4.1.1. FYI, there were a number of transaction-related  
> problems that were discovered between Geronimo and ActiveMQ (and fixed  
> in 2.1.1). They were the reason that we got a 4.1.2 release of AMQ.  
> So, there are some additional reasons for moving to G 2.1.1.
> 
> FYI, here's the relevant code in 4.1.2 --
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/tags/activemq-4.1.2/activemq-ra/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/ra/ServerSessionPoolImpl.java
> 
> When compared to the same code in 4.1.1, you'll see additional guards   
> --
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/tags/activemq-4.1.1/activemq-ra/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/ra/ServerSessionPoolImpl.java
> 
> --kevan
> 
> 


_____________________________________________________________________
Der WEB.DE SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
http://smartsurfer.web.de/?mc=100071&distributionid=000000000066


Mime
View raw message