geronimo-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jochen Zink <jochenl...@web.de>
Subject Re: Maybe a ActiveMQ Bug?
Date Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:22:43 GMT
Are you sure, that geronimo 2.1.1 contains the fixed Version of ActiveMQ? The BuckTrackingEntry
apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1215 says, the bug is fixed in Version 5.1. But Geronimo 2.1.1
contains Version 4.1.2?

Thanks!
Jochen


> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: "Jochen Zink" <jochenlist@web.de>
> Gesendet: 04.06.08 15:11:11
> An: user@geronimo.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Maybe a ActiveMQ Bug?


> Hello,
> 
> thanks for your reply. 
> 
> Maybe it is possible to use geronimo 2.1.1. I must discuss this with our development
team.
> 
> Thanks!
> Regards 
> Jochen
> 
> 
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: "Kevan Miller" <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
> > Gesendet: 04.06.08 14:18:32
> > An: user@geronimo.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: Maybe a ActiveMQ Bug?
> 
> 
> > On Jun 4, 2008, at 3:06 AM, Jochen Zink wrote:
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > We are running Geronimo 2.0.1. We are using a JMS-Queue with one 
> > Receiver (MDB). Sometimes we get this Exception on Geronimo’s stdout:
> > Exception in thread "ActiveMQ Transport: tcp://localhost/127.0.0.1:
> > 61616" java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 0, Size: 0
> > at edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurrent.CopyOnWriteArrayList.
> > remove(CopyOnWriteArrayList.java:346)
> > at org.apache.activemq.ra.ServerSessionPoolImpl.getExistingServerSessio
> > n(ServerSessionPoolImpl.java:159)
> > at org.apache.activemq.ra.ServerSessionPoolImpl.getServerSession(
> > ServerSessionPoolImpl.java:114)
> > at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionConsumer.dispatch(ActiveMQConn
> > ectionConsumer.java:136)
> > at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection.onCommand(ActiveMQConnection.
> > java:1479)
> > at org.apache.activemq.transport.ResponseCorrelator.onCommand(
> > ResponseCorrelator.java:95)
> > at org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFilter.onCommand(TransportFil
> > ter.java:65)
> > at org.apache.activemq.transport.WireFormatNegotiator.onCommand(
> > WireFormatNegotiator.java:133)
> > at org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityMonitor.onCommand(
> > InactivityMonitor.java:122)
> > at org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportSupport.doConsume(
> > TransportSupport.java:84)
> > at org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.run(TcpTransport.
> > java:137)
> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
> > 
> > After this, the ActiveMQ System seems to hang. Only a restart helps. 
> > Is this a Bug? I found this:
> > http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1246
> > 
> > It sounds a little bit similar.
> > 
> > Is there any workaround known?
> > 
> > Hi Jochen,
> > Yes, it's an ActiveMQ bug. I believe it was fixed by http://issues.
> > apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1215
> > 
> > Geronimo 2.1.1 includes the fixed version of ActiveMQ (4.1.2). Is G 2.
> > 1.1 an option for you? We haven't tested AMQ 4.1.2 with G 2.0.x, 
> > although it should be doable...
> > 
> > --kevan 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Jetzt neu! Schützen Sie Ihren PC mit McAfee und WEB.DE. 30 Tage
> kostenlos testen. http://www.pc-sicherheit.web.de/startseite/?mc=022220
> 
> 


______________________________________________________________
Jeden Monat 1 hochkarätiger maxdome-Blockbuster GRATIS!
Exklusiv für alle WEB.DE Nutzer. http://www.blockbuster.web.de


Mime
View raw message