geronimo-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stig Even Larsen <s...@nimra.no>
Subject Re: request.isUserInRole("some-role") always return false after @EJB injection
Date Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:11:28 GMT
Quoting David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>:

>
> On Jun 16, 2008, at 12:30 PM, Stig Even Larsen wrote:
>
>>
>> Quoting David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 16, 2008, at 10:12 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 16, 2008, at 7:57 AM, Stig Even Larsen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I forgot to tell that I'm using Geronimo 2.0.2 on Debian Etch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Stig Even Larsen
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Stig Even Larsen wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> After logging in via the j_security_check form I use the   
>>>>>> simplest  of jsp  page for testing purpose. I've defined   
>>>>>> several roles and  am able to check this via   
>>>>>> request.isUserInRole("some-role").  Everything is working as   
>>>>>> expected.
>>>>>> When I throw in a EJB via @EJB annotation or via JNDI lookup    
>>>>>> request.isUserInRole("some-role") is now always returning false.
>>>>>> Is this a bug or I'm I missing something here?
>>>>
>>>> Hi Stig,
>>>> I think you've run into a bug, which was recently fixed (revision  
>>>>   number 663484 for branches/2.0).
>>>>
>>>> The nightly build of 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT should contain the fix.   
>>>> You'll  find some binaries here --    
>>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20080616/
>>>
>>> Just for tracking purposes this is GERONIMO-4099.  This was the bug
>>> that came to my mind first also, but I'm not convinced it's the same
>>> problem.  Please let us know whether the 2.0.3 snapshot fixes the
>>> problem you are seeing.
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> david jencks
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --kevan
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for your reply.
>> Is this also an issue with 2.1.x?
>
> GERONIMO-4099 was an issue with 2.0.x, 2.1.x, and trunk (2.2-SNAPSHOT).
>  I fixed it in all branches at the same time.  Any progress on seeing
> if it is the problem you are running into?

Well, I'm struggeling finding an "upgrade routine". Is there any?
Anyway, since I'm at CET time (GMT+1) I probably won't be able to doing a test
until working hours tomorrow...

>
> replying to the list will get you more responses in case I'm not around :-)
> thanks
> david jencks

Sorry about that, won't happen agein ;)
>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Stig Even Larsen

Regards,
Stig Even Larsen


Mime
View raw message