Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99094 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2008 09:25:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2008 09:25:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 72700 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2008 09:25:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 72129 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2008 09:25:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: user@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list user@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 72118 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2008 09:25:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 01:25:38 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ps050202@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.187 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.187] (HELO rv-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.198.187) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 09:25:03 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b22so747943rvf.55 for ; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 01:25:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=7lAGP6+KiMU8hQRI2EsJlLtPkEIWz/EDTg47Jzq/rrs=; b=KoTClneHlO2F/utbAVwXDL+4+J42PNxUR+Jyf0uCFgQCQvfKtQn/9lCIijLMO9eCXcDei1Exs47sVl+UON9PcmxgrzFQ78tYDDj8dseR9u3FxkvS3lsapvLck4gNGYTW/2OIxvpjQE2KAjEDabmREDNKDIhIwiv8IbG8GitudGg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=OIzZb4kSq8+h060GYL2J9MtxscraoUvQY+HCiO4FDv7k9o4fvNdFNs8GVssM3C/vjShcCN2WfjdUQdc1GKNQ4p8Qeqe8kZcyCUpSBPTch0IzJ1wtVGYz6SSUqO62XJW6izQ9DPhyfOt7ypH/AbK82ZuzzeojGJFpqcnZOVc274Y= Received: by 10.141.42.10 with SMTP id u10mr1064745rvj.252.1204709113467; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 01:25:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.162.19 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 01:25:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5045edbd0803050125n2f0e2c16s3eb1259db99184f6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 14:55:13 +0530 From: "Ch Praveena" To: user@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Geronimo clustering MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_13466_9735716.1204709113449" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_13466_9735716.1204709113449 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi, I came to know that there are different types of clustering Geronimo.. Our applications are mostly based on POJO deployment.. Which method of clustering suits better.. pl suggest me at the earliest -- Regards, Praveena Chalamcharla, Securview.... ------=_Part_13466_9735716.1204709113449 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi,

  I came to know that there are different types of clustering Geronimo.. Our applications are mostly based on POJO deployment.. Which method of clustering suits better.. pl suggest me at the earliest


--
Regards,

Praveena Chalamcharla,
Securview.... ------=_Part_13466_9735716.1204709113449--