geronimo-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jason Warner" <jaw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Help installing geronimo
Date Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:09:44 GMT
At this point, you probably know as much about both approaches as I do.
mod_jk seemed more configurable, though, and my personal preference has
always been to do a little more work for more flexibility.  I don't know
what the advantages of either are, though.

On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 5:54 AM, Kenneth P. Turvey <
kt-usenet@squeakydolphin.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:24:35 +0000, Kenneth P. Turvey wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:37:08 -0400, Jason Warner wrote:
> >
> >> I think we have another option here, though.  It's possible to use
> >> Geronimo with the Apache server to run your application.
> >>  There's two ways to do this and you can find documentation for both
> >>  for
> >> Geronimo 2.1 here [1].  Doing this, you should be able to (at least
> >> with the mod_jk method) have your static content run on the HTTPd
> >> server and then have geronimo handle dynamic content.  Since you would
> >> be using HTTP as your front end, the matter of virtual hosts would be
> >> handled by the HTTP server and there is some documentation on that here
> >> [2].
>
> Is there some reason for using mod-jk over mod-proxy?  I can't find a
> list of advantages/disadvantages for either setup.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Kenneth P. Turvey <kt-usenet@squeakydolphin.com>
>
>


-- 
~Jason Warner

Mime
View raw message