Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 44457 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2008 01:50:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2008 01:50:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 48324 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2008 01:50:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 48298 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2008 01:50:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: user@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list user@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 48287 invoked by uid 99); 27 Feb 2008 01:50:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:50:40 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jaw981@gmail.com designates 209.85.142.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.142.189] (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 01:50:04 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b8so1787964tic.1 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:50:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=dwABxMq37JUj0eIa9jmhWOnhxF/u/SQBQjlR4qXn5i8=; b=eGeFENugBbdQ0/rL2HcVrUO4w5dvdtgToT1qAZdu+h6fDWAK5Le3dkcd2yoCt69t5Wg+Ze+EbVeyUILTbscGb7tOR+auKfEYf3FpxhJD6bZdesSJaR+FnHsduO0E6b+jPJU6/DLfjTtEh6lX5MIEt69oqiuo2G9DY4i14nQqz5Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=GDOZQCGx0Tdj5A1Tp1BSZYLEc1wS8pcmqsBRIpPpbNbDI2kK4fbVMsLNvgHktxtlJirRXWpF8cTOHWd1kreXO4unIwx7RFYuURr+P0gDikl2ZUW3BgUhvY1I//L7WWakfmoka7bgFaDyk69PjFrs647YDXyuni6uOicbwns7Axk= Received: by 10.151.15.3 with SMTP id s3mr1995889ybi.143.1204076995256; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:49:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.138.3 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:49:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <73a75e430802261749v5e1033d9gc219742bd7e623cd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:49:55 -0500 From: "Jason Warner" To: user@geronimo.apache.org, jacek@laskowski.net.pl Subject: Re: Geronimo 1.1 to 2.1/ J2EE to JEE(5) In-Reply-To: <1b5bfeb50802261502vcfc19b1he1dcc8aade402064@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3211_4755374.1204076995232" References: <20080226130025.181451e9c2a7ebbcd6ae28cea81146c8.dcf83f100b.wbe@email.secureserver.net> <1b5bfeb50802261502vcfc19b1he1dcc8aade402064@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_3211_4755374.1204076995232 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Mark, I've been working on putting together some migration documentation for 2.1. This seems like great information for these documents. Would you mind if I included it? On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Mark Aufdencamp > wrote: > > > To port a J2EE Enterprise Application from Geronimo 1.1 to a JEE(5) > > Enterprise Application on Geronimo 2.0/2.1 > > Does it mean that without these changes one would not be able to > migrate an ear from Geronimo 1.1 to Geronimo 2.1? What will happen > when you don't apply the changes to the dds? > > Jacek > > -- > Jacek Laskowski > http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl > -- ~Jason Warner ------=_Part_3211_4755374.1204076995232 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Mark,

I've been working on putting together some migration documentation for 2.1.  This seems like great information for these documents.  Would you mind if I included it?



On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Jacek Laskowski <jacek@laskowski.net.pl> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Mark Aufdencamp <mark@aufdencamp.com> wrote:

>  To port a J2EE Enterprise Application from Geronimo 1.1 to a JEE(5)
>  Enterprise Application on Geronimo 2.0/2.1

Does it mean that without these changes one would not be able to
migrate an ear from Geronimo 1.1 to Geronimo 2.1? What will happen
when you don't apply the changes to the dds?

Jacek

--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl



--
~Jason Warner ------=_Part_3211_4755374.1204076995232--