Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72607 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2007 22:19:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Nov 2007 22:19:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 51959 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2007 22:19:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 51931 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2007 22:19:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: user@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list user@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 51913 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2007 22:19:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:19:05 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.95.91] (HELO smtp128.plus.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (69.147.95.91) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:19:05 +0000 Received: (qmail 15175 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2007 22:18:43 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer; b=NmFcQ4J+Rvy/Eug9nGkfaH2XUEhuH4sVr1scHYOgUsk/WyFqYYu7BpgQh28OjXkzQ3Ifh6xwrJkbCXRDo9mV61W4rIg8VTt/xm4Yltc7buncfLEfhtOVtJklhqtshUbiBhaSUl+u3/8/+sKCcOwMTuEGls0erUZH/4fBy5bm7Ss= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (david_jencks@67.102.173.8 with plain) by smtp128.plus.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Nov 2007 22:18:43 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: fr8jBrcVM1kBJWfvutOpqddeiTdKQNSy7Qt2s8.DHz5oNrAmIVNs2kJ2WjuixW8JRjuscCco8SDad2z_UqiIugpCXilbSFL46nTuaWgNztoZ_W6wYQ-- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <14035947.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <14020472.post@talk.nabble.com> <1b5bfeb50711282316j5c753606o59c2d6d614af6260@mail.gmail.com> <14020710.post@talk.nabble.com> <1b5bfeb50711282346o719c797h6e1dabf24b51324d@mail.gmail.com> <14021262.post@talk.nabble.com> <1b5bfeb50711290037g321ff715s5f01abd7bab9a653@mail.gmail.com> <14035947.post@talk.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Jencks Subject: Re: How to shut donwn one of the instances on Gronimo while they were started by Multiple server command cmd line Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:17:05 -0800 To: user@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Nov 29, 2007, at 1:49 PM, abpb2006 wrote: > > oh i see. thanks. > > Where and how do we change the default credentials for every user > instance? In trunk and perhaps 2.0.2 the default security config is configured in the server-security-config module. It's set up to use the properties file login module. In trunk this is set up as a plugin and the default properties files are included in the plugin. For serious usage I'd recommend coming up with your own real-server- security-config module using kerberos/ldap/sql/whatever and replacing the default one with it using artifact_aliases.properties. If you want to keep using the toy properties file login module but just change the credentials you can edit var/security/ users.properties and var/security/groups.properties. The admin group gets remote deploy/lifecycle access. hope this helps david jencks > > > > > Jacek Laskowski wrote: >> >> On Nov 29, 2007 9:27 AM, abpb2006 wrote: >> >>> What impact its gonna have evn if we use the same default user >>> name and >>> pwd >>> i.e. SYSTEM and MANAGER for all the instances.....can one user >>> instance >>> mess >>> other users deployed application/settings etc ? >> >> If you ask about Geronimos working together to rule the world, I'd >> say >> it's not possible..today perhaps tomorrow ;-) Seriously, when someone >> breaches one geronimo instance without knowing the admin credentials >> (s)he cannot do much on another Geronimo instance - they're separate >> entities and any outside connection is (supposed to be) authorized. >> It's not recommended to leave the default system credentials >> active as >> it's widely known to everybody who has worked with Geronimo or wants >> to pass its security fence. >> >> Jacek >> >> -- >> Jacek Laskowski >> http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-shut- > donwn-one-of-the-instances-on-Gronimo-while-they-were-started-by- > Multiple-server-command-cmd-line-tf4895464s134.html#a14035947 > Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. >