Mailing-List: contact user-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of paulmcmahan@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.82.231 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer;
        b=JheGvc/vARAB79Pq22CYI62Zv2If8Z1FjiF99QuEMw/YMSdc1Zr5bW1RLN1/izNXqAS15w+08YHOlknS28+9qOGAWgPk1ASci9KycCQ5Fehtmv3KCR8qBsp5FmtxQrZYOeMQbdGTqyj7P+GXEoomHCGX3A5YTPEHwK2vK+IaojI=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
In-Reply-To: <b8b1243f0711011341p285f2001u2bd2398fa48a8147@mail.gmail.com>
References: <325257567@web.de>
 <0E8607FC-F0D6-4FC7-A57E-B44B58F42510@yahoo.com>
 <b8b1243f0711011341p285f2001u2bd2398fa48a8147@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <5B80EFA4-1B2D-4A82-930C-C1E751B95E20@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Paul McMahan <paulmcmahan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: MyFaces 1.1.5 and Geronimo 2.0.2
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 12:38:45 -0400
To: user@geronimo.apache.org

The minimal assembles don't contain the myfaces components but they  
do contain the jee-specs component.   The jee-specs component  is a  
parent of all webapps and includes the JSF 1.2 apis in its  
classpath.   I provided instructions in another email for one way to  
work around this since Jochen said that upgrading to JSF1.2 is not an  
option.


Best wishes,
Paul


On Nov 1, 2007, at 4:41 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:

>
>
> On 11/1/07, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote: Paul may  
> have more info, but my understanding is that for javaee
> compliance we need to, by default, support myfaces 1.2 and ignore any
> attempt to use earlier/other jsf implementations.
>
> You might be able to disable this support by turning off the myfaces
> and myfaces-deployer modules in config.xml by adding a load="false"
> attribute.  I can't promise this will work but it might be worth a  
> try.
>
> Good chance that will work. Alternatively, if you only require  
> simple web container support ( e.g. Tomcat), you can use the  
> minimal server. Our minimal servers don't contain myfaces/myfaces- 
> deployer.
>
> --kevan