Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 10221 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2007 14:41:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Sep 2007 14:41:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 53320 invoked by uid 500); 21 Sep 2007 14:41:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 53301 invoked by uid 500); 21 Sep 2007 14:41:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: user@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list user@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 53285 invoked by uid 99); 21 Sep 2007 14:41:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:41:06 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of c1vamsi1c@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.191 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.191] (HELO rv-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.198.191) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:41:06 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b22so741289rvf for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:40:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=zCnLLnp7irEcO/5KWWzN1+abMZ6/PiEy79+XPhFimHs=; b=im8hb3i9U6md2Rxp41z5ywECn+e84wd73hCm1GVIdlpZRUttdDvW8NLj6/1RqTD1uMlsyC729bk/QztMhJQh0tKTUg1uu4I90gfcz+KpPHrJU1wKriVaRsOuUhbogRFgMsFJUprfQQzSpvRxuHPGYo/jP+5WdQsbOrXhhyL5tC8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Av1xUmNC6FRm4EwmKNshsQsnMYmhnjNN0zSTZ5UVX1II5vQw0RdmaTXd/dmqMXrBnX+daFYOGxtV628C/YUPrlz+dcLrYf2SgkzAn+KDLH1aE1dsElypsoZspvO4qVydMgWuHBy+11Av/OSJVEQwrjOJoRjTUGvwD+zkGJxDhMY= Received: by 10.115.72.1 with SMTP id z1mr2759583wak.1190385645594; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:40:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.125.4 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:40:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <22d56c4d0709210740o75006e60v8fc3cdaaff310934@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:10:45 +0530 From: "Vamsavardhana Reddy" To: user@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Problem with defining custom Valve in config.xml In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_28295_16595369.1190385645577" References: <12794364.post@talk.nabble.com> <12796470.post@talk.nabble.com> <12803085.post@talk.nabble.com> <68166936-EA61-4C8C-A0F7-FE4DB33068E2@gmail.com> <22d56c4d0709210653lc966279u2fa3f7ca19a9dc77@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_28295_16595369.1190385645577 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline eek... my bad. I got confused with "restart" we have for configs in Admin Console. May be it is a good idea to have redeploy start any dependent configurations it stops. Vamsi On 9/21/07, Paul McMahan wrote: > > On Sep 21, 2007, at 9:53 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: > > > I would suggest not to undeploy tomcat in step 2 and use deploy.sh > > redeploy at step 6. If this works, then you need not worry about > > restarting any apps that might have got stopped when tomcat was > > undeployed as redeploy will restart everything that got stopped. > > Thanks for the suggestion but that's not the behavior that I observed > -- using "deploy.sh redeploy" still stopped the dependent modules. > > > Best wishes, > Paul > ------=_Part_28295_16595369.1190385645577 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline eek...  my bad.  I got confused with "restart" we have for configs in Admin Console.  May be it is a good idea to have redeploy start any dependent configurations it stops.

Vamsi

On 9/21/07, Paul McMahan <paulmcmahan@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sep 21, 2007, at 9:53 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:

> I would suggest not to undeploy tomcat in step 2 and use deploy.sh
> redeploy  at step 6.  If this works, then you need not worry about
> restarting any apps that might have got stopped when tomcat was
> undeployed as redeploy will restart everything that got stopped.

Thanks for the suggestion but that's not the behavior that I observed
-- using "deploy.sh redeploy" still stopped the dependent modules.


Best wishes,
Paul

------=_Part_28295_16595369.1190385645577--