Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 11086 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2007 21:14:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2007 21:14:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 69916 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2007 21:14:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 69885 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2007 21:14:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: user@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list user@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 69874 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2007 21:14:08 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:14:08 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.21.53.35] (HELO talk.nabble.com) (72.21.53.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:13:56 -0700 Received: from [72.21.53.38] (helo=jubjub.nabble.com) by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HRxGS-0001w7-8r for user@geronimo.apache.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:13:36 -0700 Message-ID: <9503712.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:13:36 -0700 (PDT) From: CedricHurst To: user@geronimo.apache.org Subject: reconciling geronimo common libs and standalone maven2 repository MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: cedric.hurst@gmail.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I have another question regarding Geronimo and Maven2 interaction. In the lab we're building, we have quite a few dependencies (Spring, Hibernate, org.json, Derby Client). We're using Maven2 to define these dependencies within the project and inject them in the WAR file, but we're wondering if there's a better way. I've often stared at the common libs portlet in the admin console and wondered if there was a way to get that talking to our standalone maven repository. This would would allow us to pull down the dependency trees through the maven command and have them available inside the Geronimo installation at-large (instead of manually adding 20+ libraries by hand from the admin console). That way, instead of specifying the dependencies in the pom.xml and deploying a 100MB+ war file, we could define the dependencies in the deployment plan and push much smaller files to the server, relying on common libs to supply the needed jars. Is this possible? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/reconciling-geronimo-common-libs-and-standalone-maven2-repository-tf3411000s134.html#a9503712 Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.