Mailing-List: contact user-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Subject: Re: Geronimo v2.0 Documentation - Topics to cover
From: Kanchana Welagedara <kanchana@opensource.lk>
Reply-To: kanchana@opensource.lk
To: user@geronimo.apache.org
Cc: dev@geronimo.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <45C9E71C.9070507@gmail.com>
References: <45C8EC4B.9010702@gmail.com>
	 <1170826983.5675.13.camel@kanchi-laptop>  <45C9E71C.9070507@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: LSF
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 12:01:50 +0530
Message-Id: <1171002710.5462.47.camel@kanchi-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 09:50 -0500, Hernan Cunico wrote:
> What you see there is the content I've been working on so far, it is not a proposal for a TOC. In fact, that is what my note is about, asking feedback for topics to cover as well as volunteers to cover some of those topics.
> 
I see oki.I had the wrong impression that you can come up with TOC/Plan.

> Absolutely, XML schemas and deployment plans should be part of the Geronimo v2.0 documentation just like how we have them in the Geronimo v1.1 documentation. Sort of related to the same topic would also be "Annotations".
> 
Yeah .I understand 
> On a different thread I saw you guys plan to work on this area (schemas and plans) for Geronimo v1.2 which is great, I'm taking granted you are volunteering to tackle v2.0 too, right!? ;-)

I think you are wrong ;-).Nothing is granted in Cathedral and Bazaar
model ;-) unless you commit it.(Just Kidding )I'll work on this as much
as possible.
  
> My only concern with v2.0, and Dain pointed it out too, some of the plans will dramatically change throughout the 2.0 development process as the specifications and additional functionality get fully integrated, specially in the EJB3 area.

I think Dain pointed out a very good point.I think we will have to wait
a bit till to let finish drastically changes and be solid in area of
openejb3.

> All, what other topics would you like to see covered in the v2.0 documentation? volunteering for some? ;-)
> Never is too much info when talking about doc, isn't it!?
Exactly :)

Regards.
Kanchana

> 
> Cheers!
> Hernan
> 
> Kanchana Welagedara wrote:
> > Hi Hernan 
> > 
> > I assume you have come up with the planed content of G2.0 as shown in
> > the below in the given url.I would like to know why the deployment plan
> > and xmls schema documents are missing in the content.I think M2 has more
> > to document in this area.
> > Any thoughts Hernan?
> > 
> > Thanks and Regards
> > Kanchana
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 15:59 -0500, Hernan Cunico wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >> I'm updating the existing Geronimo documentation to v2.0, here is the link.
> >>
> >> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/documentation.html
> >>
> >> Are there any specific topics that you guys would like to see covered for v2.0 first? Are there any topics from previous releases you guys don't want to see anymore? 
> >>
> >> Cheers!
> >> Hernan
> > 
> >