geronimo-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aman Nanner/MxI Technologies <aman.nan...@mxi.com>
Subject Re: Message-Driven Beans with run-as Subject
Date Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:20:34 GMT
Ok, I've succesfully rebuilt the openejb2 branch with my change to the
DefaultMdbContainer class.  What's the best way to deploy this modified
version of OpenEJB to my Geronimo server?  I tried adding the JARs to new
"2.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT" folders in their respective folders, but it seems
like there are specific references to the "2.2-incubating" version of
openEJB in Geronimo.  Also, if I just replace the 2.2 JARS with the new
patched JARS, then there is a serialization error that occurs during server
startup and I get a "InvalidConfigurationException".

Do I need to somehow rebuild Geronimo completely with the new OpenEJB
libraries?  If so, is there an article that describes what steps I need to
take?

Thanks,
Aman

David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote on 02-20-2007 11:51:23 AM:

>
> On Feb 19, 2007, at 9:24 PM, Aman Nanner/MxI Technologies wrote:
>
> > I checked out the MDB interceptor stack and I do see that the
> > EjbRunAsInterceptor is missing.  In order for me to add it and test
> > it out,
> > I'd need to rebuild the openejb-2.2 project.  I have this checked
> > out but
> > am having difficulty building it.  Is there an article out there for
> > building openejb-2.2?  The main page at the openejb.org site has
> > instructions on how to build openejb3, but not version 2.  I did a
> > bit of
> > searching but couldn't find it...
>
> You should have checked out
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openejb/trunk/openejb2
>
> This project builds with maven 2.0.5, and running
>
> mvn
>
> ought to work (after enough tries).
>
> What problems are you seeing?
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Aman
> >
> > David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote on 02-19-2007 01:50:24 PM:
> >
> >> It looks to me as if the mdb interceptor stack is missing the
> >> EJBRunAsInterceptor which would mean that run-as wouldn't work.  I'm
> >> also not seeing how any Subject such as the default subject is set
> >> for an mdb call.  So I think there's a bug (would rather check the
> >> spec to make sure it's supposed to work before definitely declaring a
> >> bug).  Since you can't import security with an mdb from the inbound
> >> message I'd think you could get almost the same result by making the
> >> default subject for the mdb call your run-as subject, and this might
> >> work, but I can't figure out if or how that's being set.
> >>
> >> If you would like to experiment you might compare the ejb containers
> >> and modify the mdb one to include the EJBRunAsInterceptor at a likely
> >> spot and see if it works.
> >>
> >> thanks
> >> david jencks
> >>
> >> On Feb 19, 2007, at 9:10 AM, Aman Nanner/MxI Technologies wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> One Geronimo 1.2-beta, I'm running into a problem where a message-
> >>> driven
> >>> bean that I have is unable to access a stateless session EJB that I
> >>> have,
> >>> due to method permission restrictions.  This MDB is configured
> >>> with a
> >>> "run-as" subject in the ejb-jar.xml which is supposed to allow it
> >>> to access
> >>> this restricted EJB.  I have the MDB configured similar to the
> >>> following:
> >>>
> >>> ----
> >>>       <message-driven>
> >>>          <display-name>TestMDB</display-name>
> >>>          <ejb-name>TestMDB</ejb-name>
> >>>          <ejb-class>com.acme.ejb.TestMDB</ejb-class>
> >>>          <transaction-type>Bean</transaction-type>
> >>>
> >>> <message-destination-type>javax.jms.Topic</message-destination-type>
> >>>          <activation-config>
> >>>             <activation-config-property>
> >>>
> >>> <activation-config-property-name>acknowledgeMode</activation-config-
> >>> property-name>
> >>>
> >>> <activation-config-property-value>Auto-acknowledge</activation-
> >>> config-property-value>
> >>>             </activation-config-property>
> >>>             <activation-config-property>
> >>>
> >>> <activation-config-property-name>messageSelector</activation-config-
> >>> property-name>
> >>>                <activation-config-property-value>JOB_CODE =
> >>> 'FOO'</activation-config-property-value>
> >>>             </activation-config-property>
> >>>             <activation-config-property>
> >>>
> >>> <activation-config-property-name>subscriptionDurability</activation-
> >>> config-property-name>
> >>>
> >>> <activation-config-property-value>NonDurable</activation-config-
> >>> property-value>
> >>>             </activation-config-property>
> >>>          </activation-config>
> >>>          <ejb-ref>
> >>>             <ejb-ref-name>ejb/common/TestEJB</ejb-ref-name>
> >>>             <ejb-ref-type>Session</ejb-ref-type>
> >>>             <home>com.acme.ejb.TestHome</home>
> >>>             <remote>com.acme.ejb.TestRemote</remote>
> >>>             <ejb-link>TestEJB</ejb-link>
> >>>          </ejb-ref>
> >>>          <security-identity>
> >>>             <run-as>
> >>>                <role-name>TESTROLE</role-name>
> >>>             </run-as>
> >>>          </security-identity>
> >>>       </message-driven>
> >>> ----
> >>>
> >>> Can anybody confirm if the "run-as" functionality for MDBs works as
> >>> it's
> >>> supposed to in Geronimo 1.2-beta?  Am I supposed to make a further
> >>> configuration to one of the geronimo or openejb descriptors, in
> >>> addition to
> >>> the ejb-jar.xml?
> >>>
> >>> Through some debugging in Eclipse, I've found that the "run-as"
> >>> subject
> >>> does get loaded into the MDB Deployment Context as described, but I
> >>> haven't
> >>> confirmed if it actually gets set as the Subject for the context.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Aman
> >>>
> >>> ____________________________________________________________________
> >>> __
> >>> ____________
> >>> * This message is intended only for the use of the individual or
> >>> entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that
> >>> is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under
> >>> applicable law. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to
> >>> receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose the
> >>> message or any information contained in the message. If you have
> >>> received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-
> >>> mail , and delete the message, or call (collect) 001 613 747 4698. *
> >>>
> >>
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > ____________
> > * This message is intended only for the use of the individual or
> > entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that
> > is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under
> > applicable law. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to
> > receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose the
> > message or any information contained in the message. If you have
> > received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-
> > mail , and delete the message, or call (collect) 001 613 747 4698. *
> >
>

__________________________________________________________________________________
* This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed,
and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee),
you may not use, copy or disclose the message or any information contained in the message.
If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail , and
delete the message, or call (collect) 001 613 747 4698. *


Mime
View raw message