Mailing-List: contact user-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer;
  b=gR/Ihef++YGCO/uyog6K3DKzUbfxIUPzLIOrYonp1OYkw+sAF2kSf16j8N6FG6PIW7zEtqXVxZCL6F7a/yt2Q5HSB3YMmjmO3IFPqIMGTjHCUYlUg8Ych5Ju6JRQMMxg979t2pvsgjCWrJIBQWCHCb9jAcdOmssDHblBojacXxs=
  ;
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
In-Reply-To: <fe9a63f50701020937q69652b8eub518063f8d48dfc9@mail.gmail.com>
References: <fe9a63f50701020937q69652b8eub518063f8d48dfc9@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <AFB9ACBC-DC73-4054-8FC1-077EA82E1BEC@yahoo.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: classpath issue on was ce 1.1.0.1
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 14:21:56 -0500
To: user@geronimo.apache.org


On Jan 2, 2007, at 12:37 PM, Mike Perham wrote:

> Error: Module hivemind is duplicated!  Definition in
> jar:file:/D:/perforce/depot/external/wasce/1.1.0.1/repository/com/ 
> ibm/websphere/fabric-tools-ear/6.0/fabric-tools-ear-6.0.car/fabric- 
> tools-web.war/../lib/hivemind-1.1.1.jar!/META-INF/hivemodule.xml
> has been ignored in favor of existing definition from
> jar:file:/D:/perforce/depot/external/wasce/1.1.0.1/repository/com/ 
> ibm/websphere/fabric-tools-ear/6.0/fabric-tools-ear-6.0.car/lib/ 
> hivemind-1.1.1.jar!/META-INF/hivemodule.xml.
>
> These obviously resolve to the same resource.  Why does Geronimo list
> them as two separate resources?  Any idea what I am doing wrong?  Are
> they considered to be at different "levels" within the classloader
> hierarchy (i.e. one at the ear level and another at the war level)?
>
> My WAR has a MANIFEST.MF Class-Path: entry for lib/hivemind-1.1.1.jar.


Are you sure it's geronimo that is complaining?  I searched for the  
string "has been ignored in favor of existing definition from" and  
could not find it in the geronimo code base.  (might be in xbean or  
openejb....).  In any case having more of an idea what exactly is  
complaining when (such as a stacktrace) would be helpful to figure  
out what is causing this.

thanks
david jencks

>
> mike