Mailing-List: contact user-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (idunn.apache.osuosl.org: domain nabble.com designates
 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <6477240.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: avin98 <avin98@yahoo.com>
To: user@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Geronimo 1.0 ActiveMQ and Performance
In-Reply-To: <74e15baa0609221248x4bcd06ebu60ff187fb0f7a4df@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <6453842.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <74e15baa0609221248x4bcd06ebu60ff187fb0f7a4df@mail.gmail.com>


How do I go about doing this in geronimo ?


Aaron Mulder wrote:
> 
> Could it be that the Derby database used for persistence is slowing
> down the ActiveMQ server?  Have you tried pointing ActiveMQ to a
> different database for persistence (or leaving the journal but
> disabling the database persistence)?
> 
> Thanks,
>      Aaron
> 
> On 9/22/06, avin98 <avin98@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Has anyone noticed the performance of an Embedded ActiveMQ 3.2.2 to get
>> slower and slower as the AppServer uptime increases ?
>>
>> I have been running my MDBs on geronimo 3.2.2 and I have noticed a
>> significant increase in the activeMQ performance, after restarting the
>> server everytime. The Message consumption is especially rocking fast.
>>
>> I am able to tune it a bit, by not using XA transactions, but inspite of
>> that, the performance is pathetic in some case.
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Geronimo-1.0-ActiveMQ-and-Performance-tf2319700.html#a6453842
>> Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Geronimo-1.0-ActiveMQ-and-Performance-tf2319700.html#a6477240
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.