Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46169 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2006 20:09:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Aug 2006 20:09:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 46616 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2006 20:09:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 46562 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2006 20:09:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: user@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list user@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 46512 invoked by uid 99); 28 Aug 2006 20:09:18 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:09:18 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [209.86.89.62] (HELO elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net) (209.86.89.62) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:09:17 -0700 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=ENevTWc1ewYr+48tE/aB2L6ORlW/0DRboo42NuqLM7WwVCb5H+BU8XCV9vrQEk32; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [129.33.49.251] (helo=[9.37.214.147]) by elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.34) id 1GHnPl-0006Vs-5z; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:08:57 -0400 Message-ID: <44F34D56.7070309@earthlink.net> Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:08:54 -0400 From: Dave Colasurdo User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org CC: user@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: JEE 5.0 Report Card References: <44AF1F32.1010907@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <44AF1F32.1010907@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: 7fb197089e559ffc1aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec7966f8e79869211a6d40ebf7e8f91e443e350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 129.33.49.251 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I've reorganized the JEE 5.0 report card a bit and updated it with the latest info relating to the spec levels and available packages. See: http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-jee-50-report-card.html Please take a few minutes to review and comment/update as appropriate. Thanks -Dave- David Klavon wrote: > There has been a couple of requests on the user list about where > Geronimo is in regard to moving to JEE 5.0. I started a 'JEE 5.0 Report > Card' in the wiki in an attempt to capture all of the JEE 5.0 JSRs, and > communicate where Geronimo plans to gain support for the various spec > upgrades. Some of the packages listed are just ideas at this point in > order to launch further discussion. > > Given that the JEE 5.0 rollout is expected to be implemented across > several months and releases, it would be helpful to keep this chart > updated as each JSR is addressed so our users know our rollout plan. > > Take a look... comments for improvement are welcomed. > http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-jee-50-report-card.html > > Dave > >