That's what I was suggesting. Your plan looks ok to me, but I haven't tested it. thanks david jencks On Aug 7, 2006, at 5:00 PM, avin98 wrote: > > Hi David, > > Correct me if I am wrong. In short what you are suggesting is to > create a > JMS-deployment plan, and deploy it on Geronimo 1.0. > > I change the "ServerUrl" to point to the active MQ module on my remote > server. > > Please refer to the plan below: > > > My JMS deployment plan is something like: > > configId="myJMS" parentId="geronimo/activemq-broker/1.0/car"> > > > > myJMSResources name> > name="ServerUrl">tcp://remote_server_name:61616 setting> > name="UserName">geronimo > name="Password">geronimo > > DefaultWorkManager > > > > > > javax.jms.ConnectionFactory connectionfactory-interface> > > MyQueueConnectionFactory > > javax.jms.QueueConnectionFactory implemented-interface> > > javax.jms.TopicConnectionFactory implemented-interface> > > > > > > 5 > > 3000 > > > > > > > > > javax.jms.Queue > > org.codehaus.activemq.message.ActiveMQQueue adminobject-class> > > Queue1 name> > name="PhysicalName">Queue1 > > > > > > Also I refer to these resources in my web.xml as > > > > > MyQueueConnectionFactory > javax.jms.ConnectionFactory > Container > Shareable > > > > > Queue1 > javax.jms.Queue > Produces > Queue1 > > > > Let me know if this is correct ??? > > I am using Geronimo 1.0 , and active MQ 3.2.2 > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-refer-to- > an-external-resource-from-web.xml-tf2069514.html#a5698227 > Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users forum at Nabble.com. >