Return-Path: 
 <user-return-3693-apmail-geronimo-user-archive=geronimo.apache.org@geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 83860 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2006 09:45:24 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jun 2006 09:45:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 6266 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2006 09:45:23 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 6254 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2006 09:45:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:user-help@geronimo.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@geronimo.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@geronimo.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@geronimo.apache.org
List-Id: <user.geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list user@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 6243 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2006 09:45:22 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 02:45:22 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0
	tests=HTML_00_10,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of mehtanirav@gmail.com designates
 64.233.162.200 as permitted sender)
Received: from [64.233.162.200] (HELO nz-out-0102.google.com) (64.233.162.200)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 02:45:21 -0700
Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id m7so382287nzf
        for <user@geronimo.apache.org>; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 02:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=UUegIshxXIpp9zSMuuCwjp0dpVIMW7hnonvIAA+Duz8pXktzAGuo3xIKe+m4rI+Di6XGi8Sf6KqvIPQg77DKiuWqMqDb4CvQ8fw0p80I0ecey3DWbWWtgy00nBycqVbYj24XxY7svscLTvS/Xg0cRQ4HUzFuqmcAiOSTjOYFJuM=
Received: by 10.36.250.79 with SMTP id x79mr5545815nzh;
        Sat, 10 Jun 2006 02:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.37.12.18 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 02:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <602b59a00606100245q51b87332if049c9353c0f81fb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 15:15:00 +0530
From: "Nirav Mehta" <mehtanirav@gmail.com>
To: user@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Deployment / Undeployment
In-Reply-To: <74e15baa0606100148v23c3973am8fdd7e2189bb9f8@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_2603_15143343.1149932700349"
References: <602b59a00606100121h111ea9fcy60212535ec4fd6f5@mail.gmail.com>
	 <74e15baa0606100148v23c3973am8fdd7e2189bb9f8@mail.gmail.com>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

------=_Part_2603_15143343.1149932700349
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi Aaron,

I was trying to implement a configurable web application using JMX. But
obviusly, my trouble is in registering the MBeans at deployment and
unregistering them when undeployed. I think I now understand why you guys
reckon GBeans to be a better implementation than MBeans. But obviously,
here, the problem would be portability of the application. I will definitely
consider this a good option if we are going to stick with geronimo and not
worry about portability.
Also, are the configurations persistant or do I have to implement the
persistance through code? This is important since I dont want the
configurations to be lost when the server is restarted.
I think there is plenty of documentation regarding the creation of GBeans,
but please recommend the one you like best.

Thanks,
Nirav

------=_Part_2603_15143343.1149932700349
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi Aaron,<br><br>I was trying to implement a configurable web application using JMX. But obviusly, my trouble is in registering the MBeans at deployment and unregistering them when undeployed. I think I now understand why you guys reckon GBeans to be a better implementation than MBeans. But obviously, here, the problem would be portability of the application. I will definitely consider this a good option if we are going to stick with geronimo and not worry about portability.
<br>Also, are the configurations persistant or do I have to implement the persistance through code? This is important since I dont want the configurations to be lost when the server is restarted.<br>I think there is plenty of documentation regarding the creation of GBeans, but please recommend the one you like best.
<br><br>Thanks,<br>Nirav<br> 

------=_Part_2603_15143343.1149932700349--