Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 93452 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2006 20:21:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jun 2006 20:21:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 6129 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2006 20:21:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 5671 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2006 20:21:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: user@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list user@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 5656 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2006 20:21:34 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 13:21:34 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [72.10.46.63] (HELO as.toolazydogs.com) (72.10.46.63) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 13:21:33 -0700 Received: (qmail 32130 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2006 13:21:12 -0700 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.1.2?) (202.58.246.99) by toolazydogs.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 18 Jun 2006 13:21:12 -0700 Message-ID: <4495B5B5.4030808@toolazydogs.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 04:21:09 +0800 From: "Alan D. Cabrera" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Macintosh/20060505) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: user@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] 1.1 Release References: <4491769B.1010709@hogstrom.org> <74e15baa0606180532v301637edgb2cd794d8ed00afa@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <74e15baa0606180532v301637edgb2cd794d8ed00afa@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I too am very confused. Regards, Alan Aaron Mulder wrote: > Do we need a new candidate and vote? This thread was started (with > binaries already posted) on Jun 15, 11:02 AM. But there have been > changes to the 1.1.0 branch as of Fri Jun 16 9:10 PM. I'm not sure we > should carry votes on the old binaries forward to the new binaries. > > Thanks, > Aaron > > On 6/18/06, Mohammed Nour wrote: >> +1 >> >> >> On 6/15/06, Matt Hogstrom wrote: >> > All, >> > >> > I have created what I hope is the final release of Geronimo 1.1. >> There >> has been a lot of work that >> > has gone into this release (please review the RELEASE-NOTES). Here >> are >> the final release candidates >> > for your review. >> > >> > *DayTrader Application* >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/daytrader-ear-1.1.ear >> > >> > I'm working on a website and documentation to help folks out but the >> deliverable is the ear above. >> > >> > *Geronimo 1.1 Version* >> > >> > *Source* >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-1.1_src.tar.gz >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-1.1_src.zip >> > >> > *Full J2EE Jetty Version* >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.1.tar.gz >> >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.1.zip >> > >> > *Minimal Jetty Version* >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-jetty-minimal-1.1.tar.gz >> >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-jetty-minimal-1.1.zip >> >> > >> > *Full Tomcat Version* >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.1.tar.gz >> >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.1.zip >> >> > >> > *Minimal Tomcat Version* >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-tomcat-minimal-1.1.tar.gz >> >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-tomcat-minimal-1.1.zip >> >> > >> > >> > *Geronimo 1.1 Source Code* >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/org.apache.geronimo.specs.tar.gz >> >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/org.apache.geronimo.specs.zip >> >> > >> > Please remember that only PMC votes are binding but they will >> ultimately >> make their decision based >> > on your feedback. >> > >> > Thanks to everyone who has spent long hours working on this. >> > >> > A special thanks to Jencks, Sisson and Miller who spent long days >> working >> on getting the final >> > release right with License issues, last minute release note >> changes, etc. >> > >> > I look forward to a positive outcome and a unanimous vote by Sunday. >> Assuming all goes well by >> > Sunday night I will propogate the jars to the mirrors on Sunday and >> declare the release official on >> > Tuesday. >> > >> > Cross your fingers, grab your beverage of choice and let's close this >> release out. >> > >> > Matt >> > >> >>