geronimo-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Zakharov, Vasily M" <vasily.m.zakha...@intel.com>
Subject RE: Memory & Uptime in Console
Date Fri, 26 May 2006 15:27:35 GMT

No, in fact. :)

It's fine to me as it is, I was just wondering if this behaviour is
intentional.

Thank you.

 Vasily


-----Original Message-----
From: ammulder@gmail.com [mailto:ammulder@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Aaron
Mulder
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 6:36 PM
To: user@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Memory & Uptime in Console

That's not necessarily on purpose.  It's certainly the case that we
tried to keep things brief in the left menu bar, but we ought to try
to make them meaningful, short, and synchronized with the common
console actions list.  Would you like to submit a patch?

Thanks,
    Aaron

On 5/26/06, Zakharov, Vasily M <vasily.m.zakharov@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> I've just noticed that "Memory & Uptime" link is only present in
"Common
> Console Actions" tab, but not in the main menu of the Console. Is it
so
> on purpose?
>
> Also, some links in "Common Console Actions" tab are named differently
> than the same links in the main menu. Is it so on purpose?
>
> I'm using Geronimo 1.0.
>
> Vasily Zakharov
> Intel Middleware Products Division
>

Mime
View raw message