Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 77189 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2006 02:16:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Apr 2006 02:16:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 10657 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2006 02:16:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 10628 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2006 02:16:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: user@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list user@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 10614 invoked by uid 99); 11 Apr 2006 02:16:33 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 19:16:33 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of gcjgu-user@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.2 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.2] (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 19:16:32 -0700 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FT8QL-0002SB-H0 for user@geronimo.apache.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 04:16:09 +0200 Received: from 59.93.74.99 ([59.93.74.99]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 04:16:09 +0200 Received: from jsmammen by 59.93.74.99 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 04:16:09 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: user@geronimo.apache.org From: Mammen Subject: Re: How to deploy a web application based on Struts 1.2, Spring 1.2 and Hibernate 3 on Geronimo 1.0? Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 02:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <4439D116.6050704@gmail.com> <443A6C06.8080008@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 59.93.74.99 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1) Sender: news X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Guilherme Rios writes: > > The way I see it, a "vanilla" J2EE application would be deployed in > Geronimo without problems. The issue is, when you depend on projects > that Geronimo also provides and are not part of standard J2EE but became > de facto standards, you have to use a vendor-specific deployment plan. > This is not desirable, but does not differ much from what others do either. > > I would not consider it a J2EE compatibility issue, but given lots of > people - me included =) - will deploy struts/spring/hibernate apps to > Geronimo it would be nice being able to do so without having to deal > with specific application server issues. > > Cheers, > > Guilherme > As far as I understood the specs, the webapps jar files in WEB-INF/lib classes should be visible to the web application, not servers when there are different versions of the same class. This way I can have many different versions of classes in seperate web app. This should be default. Anyway the application that I am deploying has deployed successfully into Tomcat, Jetty and Weblogic without any modification in classloader configuration.