Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 70490 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2006 20:34:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2006 20:34:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 68979 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2006 20:34:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 68669 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2006 20:34:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: user@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list user@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 68647 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2006 20:34:21 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:34:21 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of david.blevins@visi.com designates 208.42.156.9 as permitted sender) Received: from [208.42.156.9] (HELO cenn.mc.mpls.visi.com) (208.42.156.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:34:20 -0800 Received: from [192.168.42.19] (68-171-56-105.vnnyca.adelphia.net [68.171.56.105]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cenn.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D7E82EB for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:33:59 -0600 (CST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <9E84FEF6-94F7-422D-962B-AE05C8BE67B2@visi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: user@geronimo.apache.org From: David Blevins Subject: User Feedback Request -- this means you! Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:00:35 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N So this is the first of what I think should be a quarterly event. Geronimo is ultimately your project and we committers are but your humble servants. To serve you best, we need some critical high level feedback to help us steer the project and focus on what matters most to you! Please, every user out there, give us your top 5 things we can do to make Geronimo better for you. Here is my list: 1) More interaction with you guys, the users! 2) More frequent releases incorporating more user feedback (small releases more often vs. big releases only 4 times a year) 3) Less deployment requirements (simpler plans, more defaults, etc.) 4) More application validation at deployment 5) More powerful text configuration That's just to get the ball rolling. More detail is always good if you have the time. In general anything you think we need to correct as a community, technical or non-technical. Let us know. If you've ever uttered the words, "Geronimo would be such a great project if it only...." then now is your time to shine. We want to hear from everyone! This is not just for the "hard-core" Geronimo users or J2EE experts. If you are new to J2EE and downloaded Geronimo and had to give up after an hour of no progress, let us know what we might do! It's all about you. Best Regards, David Blevins