geronimo-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hiram Chirino" <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
Subject Re: Deploy Tool: deploy vs redeploy
Date Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:40:46 GMT
I think lots of folks hate getting prompted by console programs. 
Thats' why rm has a -f option.
And why brave folks do a:
alias rm 'rm -f'

On 3/28/06, Paul McMahan <paulmcmahan@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/25/06, Hernan Cunico <hcunico@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think we all agree that the easier for the user the better.
> >
> > Having one deploy command smart enough to deploy or redeploy based on the current
status would be
> > cool as Aaron suggested. I think it would also be nice, if the command is going
to redeploy a
> > running app, to have a confirmation message like "... App XYZ already running, redeploy?
[Y/N]",
> > whis this said, a new flag to the command should be added to force a response to
that command.
> >
>
> I like Hernan's idea about prompting the user.  But I would make the
> new flag force the redeploy instead of forcing a response.  Kinda like
> how the "mv" and "rm" commands work:
>
> $ umask 777
> $ touch foo1
> $ touch foo2
> $ mv foo1 foo2
> mv: overwrite `foo2', overriding mode 0000? n
> $ mv -f foo1 foo2
> $
>
>
> Best wishes,
> Paul
>


--
Regards,
Hiram

Mime
View raw message