Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 27692 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2005 15:19:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Dec 2005 15:19:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 54444 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2005 11:15:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-user-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 54402 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2005 11:15:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: user@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list user@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 54369 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2005 11:15:34 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 03:15:33 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of schmidtitc@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.206 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.206] (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.206) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 03:15:33 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i13so550274wra for ; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 03:15:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=d8Qd3km6itXXFH44Qi6Dp6pdkTFVbrWkItYOjDbwVa64z7A7A6geGhIgaZaG4DAy2lJUbcpv8IpM7GRLLmjjLIbWANOAxTWRZt1aMaldl8GywFzD0OS90HUgj947rGdJJF8snK5MMP7BS37pHRqQCSgddWb1Pw1N9WZssx6qrNY= Received: by 10.54.128.12 with SMTP id a12mr422501wrd; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 03:15:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.1? ( [125.209.163.180]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 44sm2813339wri.2005.12.07.03.15.09; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 03:15:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4396C437.8040400@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 22:15:03 +1100 From: Stefan Schmidt User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: user@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Web Services Question References: <466797bd0512070219j3873b498ob7601b0d2f3a8910@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <466797bd0512070219j3873b498ob7601b0d2f3a8910@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Manu, As long as your WS is JAX-RPC conformant you can deploy either type - document or rpc-style Web services. As for the differences between both, there is a long list... Basically document-style is far more coarse grained and business/document-oriented, also I think this is the future of WS. Document-style WS can be used in synchronous and asynchronous scenarios as opposed to rpc which only supports synchronous invocations. RPC-style is really what the name says - invoking remote procedures. Many developers find this style easier to understand. I find this article quite comprehensive: http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/xml/jaxrpcpatterns/ Hope this helps. Regards, Stefan Schmidt Manu George wrote: >Hi, > Can you deploy Document style web services in Geronimo? If so what >are the differences in deployment from JAX-RPC style web services? > >Thanks >Manu > > >