geronimo-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From John Sisson <jrsis...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Messing with the terminal
Date Fri, 25 Nov 2005 23:21:37 GMT
I am working on providing another startup option that outputs the same 
type of startup information you had but without lines of output being 
reupdated through the use of carriage returns without a line feed.  I 
plan on getting these changes in for the 1.0 release.

Regards,

John

Guglielmo.Lichtner@instinet.com wrote:

>
> It looks like it works now. I didn't change anything. It's possible 
> that yesterday the output that was whizzing by
> was coming from the server's jvm, not the deployer's which would 
> explain why it couldn't be redirected.
>
> BTW, the startup sequence is cute, meaning 10%/20%/30%... etc. but 
> when redirect the output to a file you can
> see the vt100 escape sequences you are using (or whatever they are) 
> and it looks bad. IMHO I don't think it's
> worth it.
>
> However, if someone decides to write a vt100-compatible admin console 
> into the running server that would be
> very cool.
>
> Thanks
> Guglielmo
>
>
>
>
> 	*Aaron Mulder <ammulder@alumni.princeton.edu>*
> Sent by: ammulder@gmail.com
>
> 11/24/2005 05:05 PM
> Please respond to user
>
> 	       
>         To:        user@geronimo.apache.org
>         cc:        
>         Subject:        Re: Messing with the terminal
>
>
>
>
> Does it help to put the "2>&1" before the "> dump"?  Also I think you
> should be OK with just "> dump" as opposed to "1> dump".  So :
>
> java -jar bin/deployer.jar deploy plan.xml 2>&1 >dump
>
> Aaron
>
> On 11/24/05, Guglielmo.Lichtner@instinet.com
> <Guglielmo.Lichtner@instinet.com> wrote:
> >
> > I am having extreme difficulty capturing stderr and stdout to 
> redirect to
> > the file when I do this:
> >
> > java -jar bin/deployer.jar deploy <plan> 1>dump 2>&1
> >
> > I have even tried putting it in a shell script and even putting { } 
> around
> > it (which should have made no difference anyway).
> >
> > As a result it is impossible for me to capturing a big stack trace 
> which is
> > coming out.
> >
> > Is this behavior intended?
> >
> > *****************************************************************
> >  <<>>
> >
> >  In compliance with applicable rules and regulations, Instinet
> >  reviews and archives incoming and outgoing email communications,
> >  copies of which may be produced at the request of regulators.
> >  This message is intended only for the personal and confidential
> >  use of the recipients named above. If the reader of this email
> >  is not the intended recipient, you have received this email in
> >  error and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying is
> >  strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error,
> >  please notify the sender immediately by return email and
> >  permanently delete the copy you received.
> >
> >  Instinet accepts no liability for any content contained in the
> >  email, or any errors or omissions arising as a result of email
> >  transmission. Any opinions contained in this email constitute
> >  the sender's best judgment at this time and are subject to change
> >  without notice. Instinet does not make recommendations of a
> >  particular security and the information contained in this email
> >  should not be considered as a recommendation, an offer or a
> >  solicitation of an offer to buy and sell securities.
> >
> > *****************************************************************
> >
>
>


Mime
View raw message