geronimo-scm mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ge...@apache.org
Subject cvs commit: incubator-geronimo/docs_nopublish JBoss_20031031.html
Date Sat, 29 Nov 2003 15:52:23 GMT
geirm       2003/11/29 07:52:23

  Modified:    docs_nopublish JBoss_20031031.html
  Log:
  update based on suggestions from the list
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.3       +18 -13    incubator-geronimo/docs_nopublish/JBoss_20031031.html
  
  Index: JBoss_20031031.html
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/incubator-geronimo/docs_nopublish/JBoss_20031031.html,v
  retrieving revision 1.2
  retrieving revision 1.3
  diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
  --- JBoss_20031031.html	18 Nov 2003 20:47:06 -0000	1.2
  +++ JBoss_20031031.html	29 Nov 2003 15:52:22 -0000	1.3
  @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
   <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
   <html>
   <head>
  -  <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
  - http-equiv="content-type">
  +  <meta http-equiv="content-type"
  + content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
     <title>JBoss 20031031</title>
   </head>
   <body>
  @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
   and B - the license clearly states that <br>
     </li>
   </ol>
  -<div style="margin-left: 80px; font: fix">&nbsp;* 1. Redistributions of source
  +<div style="margin-left: 80px;">&nbsp;* 1. Redistributions of source
   code must retain the above copyright<br>
   &nbsp;*&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; notice, this list of conditions and the
   following disclaimer.<br>
  @@ -85,8 +85,9 @@
   <br>
   Ceki has traced back the history of the XLevel class, and thus we
   claim that the XLevel code originated at the ASF as part of the log4j
  -project. Thus, we believe that Exhibit A is invalid due to the code in
  -question being copyrighted by the ASF in the first place.&nbsp; <br>
  +project. Thus, we believe that Exhibit A is invalid due to the fact
  +that the original source of the code in question is copyrighted by the
  +ASF. <br>
   <br>
   <h3>Summary for Exhibit B</h3>
   Exhibit B in concerned with similarity between <a
  @@ -108,8 +109,9 @@
   first clause of the Apache Software License.<br>
   </div>
   <br>
  -We believe that the claims in Exhibit B is invalid due to the code in
  -question being based on the same code in the Apache log4j codebase.<br>
  +We believe that the claims in Exhibit B are invalid owing to the fact
  +that the code in
  +question was based on code in the Apache log4j codebase.<br>
   <h3>Summary for Exhibit C</h3>
   Exhibit C is concerned with the similarity between
   org.apache.geronimo.common.InvocationType and
  @@ -119,7 +121,8 @@
   The initial version of org.jboss.invocation.InvocationType in the JBoss
   CVS repository can be found at the following location:<br>
   <br>
  -<a href="http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/jboss/jboss/src/main/org/jboss/invocation/InvocationType.java?rev=1.1&amp;view=markup">http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/jboss/jboss/src/main/org/jboss/invocation/InvocationType.java?rev=1.1&amp;view=markup</a><br>
  +<a
  + href="http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/jboss/jboss/src/main/org/jboss/invocation/InvocationType.java?rev=1.1&amp;view=markup">http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/jboss/jboss/src/main/org/jboss/invocation/InvocationType.java?rev=1.1&amp;view=markup</a><br>
   <br>
   This contains a very similar code excerpt to that cited in the letter
   from JBoss Group LLC:<br>
  @@ -164,7 +167,8 @@
   <br>
   Dain's last rev is<br>
   <br>
  -<a href="http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/jboss/jboss/src/main/org/jboss/invocation/InvocationType.java?content-type=text%2Fplain&amp;rev=1.3">http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/jboss/jboss/src/main/org/jboss/invocation/InvocationType.java?content-type=text%2Fplain&amp;rev=1.3</a><br>
  +<a
  + href="http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/jboss/jboss/src/main/org/jboss/invocation/InvocationType.java?content-type=text%2Fplain&amp;rev=1.3">http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/jboss/jboss/src/main/org/jboss/invocation/InvocationType.java?content-type=text%2Fplain&amp;rev=1.3</a><br>
   <br>
   The latest rev in JBoss is v 1.5, so we need to figure out what
   happened between v1.3, which Dain had the right to contribute to the ASF<br>
  @@ -236,7 +240,8 @@
   However, it used to be, when the code first placed into Geronimo,
   slightly different :<br>
   <br>
  -<a href="http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/incubator-geronimo/modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/common/Attic/Invocation.java?rev=1.1&amp;content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup">http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/incubator-geronimo/modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/common/Attic/Invocation.java?rev=1.1&amp;content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup</a><br>
  +<a
  + href="http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/incubator-geronimo/modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/common/Attic/Invocation.java?rev=1.1&amp;content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup">http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/incubator-geronimo/modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/common/Attic/Invocation.java?rev=1.1&amp;content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup</a><br>
   <br>
   public interface Invocation {<br>
   &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Object getMarshal(Object key);<br>
  @@ -338,9 +343,9 @@
   dropped.&nbsp; All that remains of the idea is letting the caller
   declare the data as transient.<br>
   <br>
  -Here's the kicker.&nbsp; The JBoss lawyers assert that "the Invocation
  -file is central to the architecture of both JBoss and Geronimo".&nbsp;
  -We believe that this claim is invalid because if this notion of AsIs,
  +While the JBoss lawyers assert that "the Invocation file is central to
  +the architecture of both JBoss and Geronimo", we believe that this
  +claim is invalid&nbsp; because if this notion of AsIs,
   Transient and Marshalled was 'central to the architecture', it couldn't
   be dropped to the degree that the Geronimo developers did.&nbsp; IOW,
   the notions of AsIs and Marshalled are NOT central to the architecture
  
  
  

Mime
View raw message